Table 4

Sensitivity of RNAi by feeding versus injection

Gene(s)
Feeding phenotype
Injection phenotype
Gene information

K04G2.8a
Unc, Bmd, Lvl
Emb
apr-1 (APC-related)
F18C12.2a
Emb, Unc, Mlt, Bmd
Emb, Unc, Mlt, Lvl
DNA-J domain
ZK265.5,6*
Gro
Gro
G-protein-coupled receptor/unknown function
T01G9.4
Emb, Gro, Clr
Emb, Gro
kup-2 (unknown function)
T01G9.5
Emb
Emb
mei-1 (meiotic spindle formation)
T01G9.6a
Emb, Gro, Pvl
Emb
kin-10 (CKII-beta subunit)
F52B5.6
Emb, Ste
Emb, Ste
Ribosomal protein L25
T19A6.2a
Gro
Gro
Ynr053p-like protein
D1081.2
Unc, Prz
Unc
MADS domain
D1081.8
Emb
Emb
Myb-like DNA-binding domain
K02B12.1
Unc, Mlt
Gro, Mlt, Lvl
ceh-6 (POU homeodomain protein)
K02B12.3
Ste, Gro
Ste
WD domains
K02B12.8
Him
None
Unknown function

From chromosome 1, 86 random genes from consecutive cosmids were selected to test the sensitivity of feeding versus injection for detecting RNAi phenotypes. Of these, 13 gave a phenotype by either method, 13 by feeding and 12 by injection; 11 of these genes have no previously described mutant or RNAi phenotype. Genes were determined to have a given phenotype if at least 10% of progeny had that phenotype, except for sterility, which required an average brood size of less than ten, and the Him phenotype, which required at least two out of three fed worms to have >5% male progeny. Bmd, body morphology defect; Clr, clear; Emb, embryonic lethal; Gro, slow growth; Him, high incidence of males; Lvl, larval lethal (death at any larval stage); Mlt, molting defect (old cuticle remains attached); Prz, paralyzed; Pvl, protruding vulva; Ste, sterile; Unc, uncoordinated. *The fragment used overlaps two predicted genes: ZK265.5 and ZK265.6.

Kamath et al. Genome Biology 2000 2:research0002.1   doi:10.1186/gb-2000-2-1-research0002