Table 6 |
||||
|
Variation of the correlation in the measurements performed with two sources of sulfur |
||||
|
Centile |
Met A 1 ? MTR A 1 |
Met A 10 ? MTR A 10 |
Met B 1 ? MTR B 1 |
Met B 10 ? MTR B 10 |
|
|
||||
|
0-20 |
0.751 |
0.767 |
0.636 |
0.777 |
|
20-40 |
0.685 |
0.680 |
0.514 |
0.681 |
|
40-60 |
0.730 |
0.663 |
0.608 |
0.749 |
|
60-80 |
0.821 |
0.736 |
0.738 |
0.843 |
|
80-100 |
0.945 |
0.912 |
0.946 |
0.969 |
|
|
||||
|
The data is arranged as in Table 5. Correlation is good, indicating that there is not a large difference between growth on methionine and growth on MTR (as expected). |
||||
|
Sekowska et al. Genome Biology 2001 2:research0019.1 doi:10.1186/gb-2001-2-6-research0019 |
||||