Figure 1.
Mechanisms of classical and secretory gene traps. (a) In this example, the classical gene-trap vector inserts into a gene (in this case
encoding a protein without a leader sequence) between exons 2 and 3. During transcription
from the target-gene promoter, the splice-acceptor site (SA) at the 5' end of β-geo
is spliced to the next upstream splice-donor site (SD). The vector polyadenylation
signal (pA) stops transcription; a truncated transcript is thus produced that encodes
a fusion protein between sequences encoded by exons 1 and 2 of the target gene and
β-geo. UTR, untranslated region. (b) The modified secretory-trap vector incorporates a transmembrane (TM) domain, an internal
ribosome entry site (IRES) and an alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) gene. Only the situation
after insertion of this vector into a gene encoding a protein with a hydrophobic leader
sequence (S) is shown. A bicistronic transcript is produced, encoding first a fusion
between the endogenous protein and β-geo that localizes to the neuronal cell body
and second the PLAP protein, which localizes to the entire cell surface, including
the axon. (c) Modified secretory trap insertions into genes encoding proteins with hydrophobic
leaders apparently result in fusion proteins that are inserted into membranes in a
type I orientation (right) [12]. This places the β-galactosidase domain of β-geo (blue)
in the cytosol, where it is more active than in fusions with leaderless proteins;
the latter result in a type II orientation (left) with β-galactosidase in the lumen
of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER). (d) Expression of β-geo (blue) and PLAP (purple) in a neuron.
Furley Genome Biology 2001 2:reviews1026.1 doi:10.1186/gb-2001-2-9-reviews1026 |