Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
.reviews
 |  |  |  |  | 


 
Highly AccessProtein family review

The Wnts

Jeffrey R Miller email

Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Development, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA

author email corresponding author email

Genome Biology 2001, 3:reviews3001.1-3001.15doi:10.1186/gb-2001-3-1-reviews3001

Subject areas: Development, Cell biology, Cancer, Evolution, Genetics

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://genomebiology.com/2001/3/1/reviews/3001

Published: 28 December 2001

© 2001 BioMed Central Ltd

Summary

The Wnt genes encode a large family of secreted protein growth factors that have been identified in animals from hydra to humans. In humans, 19 WNT proteins have been identified that share 27% to 83% amino-acid sequence identity and a conserved pattern of 23 or 24 cysteine residues. Wnt genes are highly conserved between vertebrate species sharing overall sequence identity and gene structure, and are slightly less conserved between vertebrates and invertebrates. During development, Wnts have diverse roles in governing cell fate, proliferation, migration, polarity, and death. In adults, Wnts function in homeostasis, and inappropriate activation of the Wnt pathway is implicated in a variety of cancers.

Gene organization and evolutionary history

Gene organization

In humans, 19 WNT genes have been identified and the chromosomal locations of each is known (see Table 1) [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Several human WNT genes are located very close to each other in the genome [7,8]; these include WNT6 and WNT10a, which are located immediately adjacent to one another on chromosome 2 (about 6.4 kilobases (kb) apart), and WNT1 and WNT10b, which are located adjacent to each other on chromosome 12 (about 8.1 kb apart). WNT6 and WNT10a are transcribed in opposite directions, whereas WNT1 and WNT10b are expressed from the same strand of DNA. Several additional pairs of WNT genes are also clustered within the human genome, including WNT2 and WNT16 (about 4 megabases (Mb) apart), WNT3a and WNT14 (about 250 kb apart), and WNT3 and WNT15. In the mouse, there are at least 18 Wnt genes and the locations of all but two of them have been determined [1,2,3,5,6]. As in humans, the mouse Wnt1/Wnt10b, Wnt6/Wnt10a, and Wnt3/Wnt15 gene pairs are each located on the same chromosomes, and in the case of the Wnt1/Wnt10b and Wnt6/Wnt10a pairs the close proximity of these genes has been conserved from mouse to human. Interestingly, in the Drosophila genome, the paralogous genes wingless (wg), DWnt6 and DWnt10, are located immediately adjacent to one another on the second chromosome and are all transcribed in the same orientation. Thus, it is possible that there was an ancient cluster of Wnt genes consisting of Wnt1, Wnt6 and Wnt10 in a common ancestor of vertebrates and arthropods. In vertebrates, this cluster may have been duplicated with subsequent loss of Wnt1 from one cluster and Wnt6 from the other.

Table 1. Chromosomal locations of WNT genes in human and mouse

The majority of human WNT genes contain four coding exons, with exon 1 containing the initiation methionine (Figure 1a) [8]. WNT genes that differ from this pattern include WNT14, with three exons, WNT2, WNT5b, and WNT11, with five exons, and WNT8b with six exons. Several WNTs - WNT2b/13, WNT8a/d, and WNT16 - have alternative amino or carboxyl termini, which result from the use of alternative 5' or 3' exons.

thumbnailFigure 1. (a) Structures of selected members of the human WNT gene family. Exons are shown as boxes and introns as lines. For each gene, 'RNA' represents the portion of the gene that is transcribed and 'CDS' represents the portion that encodes protein. WNT8a/d is an example of a gene with 3' alternative splicing and WNT16 is an example of a gene with alternatively used 5' exons. (b) Structural features of the Wnt protein. The amino terminus contains a signal sequence (S). All Wnts contain 23 or 24 conserved cysteine residues (C) with similar spacing, suggesting that the folding of Wnt proteins depends on the formation of multiple intramolecular disulfide bonds.

Evolutionary history

The deduced evolutionary relationships of 18 of the 19 known human WNT genes are shown in Figure 2. The majority of Wnt proteins share about 35% amino-acid sequence identity, although members of a subgroup (those with the same numeral, such as WNT3 and WNT3a) share increased sequence identity (from 58% to 83%) and some overlapping sites of expression. Members of subgroups are not closely linked within the genome, however, suggesting that they were generated by gene-translocation or genome-duplication events, not by local duplication events.

thumbnailFigure 2. Predicted evolutionary relationships between members of the Wnt gene family. (a) Predicted relationships between 18 of the 19 known human WNT protein sequences; WNT15 was omitted because only a partial sequence is available. (b) Predicted evolutionary relationships between selected human WNT proteins (representing each large grouping shown in (a)) and Wnt proteins from mouse, Xenopus, Drosophila, and Caenorhabditis elegans. Sequences were aligned using the ClustalW program; trees were constructed from the alignments using the neighbor-joining method and are diagrammed using midpoint rooting. Numbers indicate branch lengths.

Wnt genes have been identified in vertebrates and invertebrates, but appear to be absent from plants, unicellular eukaryotes such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae and from prokaryotes. To date, in vertebrates, 16 Wnt genes have been identified in Xenopus, 11 in chick, and 12 in zebrafish [5]; in invertebrates, Drosophila has seven Wnt genes, Caenorhabditis elegans five and Hydra at least one [5]. The apparent evolutionary relationships between selected invertebrate and vertebrate Wnt genes are shown in Figure 2b. In vertebrates, the orthologs in different species are highly similar in sequence. For example, human WNT1 and mouse Wnt1 are 98% identical, and human WNT3a and Xenopus Wnt5a are 84% identical at the amino-acid level. Phylogenetic analyses of vertebrate and invertebrate Wnts demonstrate orthologous relationships between several human and Drosophila Wnts (Figure 2b). The sequence identity between orthologous proteins in humans and flies ranges from 21% between human WNT8a/d and Drosophila DWnt8 to 42% sequence identity between human WNT1 and Drosophila Wingless (Wg). The evolutionary relationship between the five C. elegans Wnt genes and human WNT genes is less apparent, making it difficult to determine which C. elegans Wnt genes may have orthologs in the human genome.

Characteristic structural features

Human WNT proteins are all very similar in size, ranging in molecular weight from 39 kDa (WNT7a) to 46 kDa (WNT10a) [3]. Drosophila Wnt proteins are also similar to this, with the exception of Wg, which is approximately 54 kDa and has an internal insert not found in vertebrate Wnts, and DWnt3/5, which is about 112 kDa [3]. Very little is known about the structure of Wnt proteins, as they are notoriously insoluble, but all have 23 or 24 cysteine residues, the spacing of which is highly conserved (Figure 1b), suggesting that Wnt protein folding may depend on the formation of multiple intramolecular disulfide bonds. Analysis of the signaling activities of chimeric Wnt proteins has shown that the carboxy-terminal region of Wnt proteins may play a role in determining the specificity of responses to different Wnts [9]. Furthermore, deletion mutants lacking the carboxy-terminal third of a Wnt protein can act as dominant-negatives in a cell-non-autonomous manner [10], suggesting that the amino-terminal region may mediate interactions with Wnt receptors but requires the carboxyl terminus to activate these receptors.

Localization and function

Post-translational modifications and secretion

Wnt proteins have an amino-terminal signal sequence, can act in a cell non-autonomous manner, and are present in the secretory pathway, indicating that they are secreted proteins [11]. In addition, genetic analyses of Wg signaling in Drosophila uncovered mutations in the porcupine gene that show a lack of Wnt activity due to the retention of Wg protein in the endoplasmic reticulum [12,13,14]. The porcupine gene is predicted to encode a protein with eight transmembrane domains and has a perinuclear localization in transfected cells [14]; overexpression of porcupine does not increase levels of secreted Wg but does change the pattern of Wg glycosylation [14]. In worms, mom-1 encodes a porcupine homolog and, when mutated, phenocopies mutants of mom-2, which encodes a Wnt, suggesting that the function of porcupine is conserved [15,16]. Although size chromatography suggests that Wg is secreted as a multimer, it remains unclear whether Wnt proteins in general are secreted as monomers, oligomers, or as part of a multi-protein complex [17]. Wnt proteins are glycosylated, but mutation of some or all of the predicted glycosylation sites in mouse Wnt1 does not abolish its activity in cultured cells [18]; these modifications may thus be unimportant for Wnt function.

Subcellular localization

Once secreted, Wnt proteins associate with glycosaminoglycans in the extracellular matrix and are bound tightly to the cell surface [19,20]. Although Wnts are found in tight association with the plasma membrane, it is possible to collect active Wnt from the medium of cultured cells [21,22]. Beyond this information, the localization of Wnt proteins in vertebrates is poorly understood. Examination of the localization of Wg in Drosophila, however, has provided critical insights into the subcellular distribution of Wnt proteins and the importance of this distribution for signaling activity. In the embryonic epidermis, Wg is found inside cells that secrete Wg and in association with the plasma membrane of secreting cells and non-secreting cells several cell diameters from the Wg source [23]. Wg is also prevalent in vesicles and multi-vesicular bodies of non-Wg-producing cells anterior to the source of Wg, suggesting that Wg is endocytosed [23,24]. This idea is supported by examination of shibire embryos, which have a mutation in dynamin, a critical component of the endocytic machinery; these mutants have defects in Wg distribution, and Wg signaling activity is compromised [25]. Similarly, expression of a dominant-negative form of shibire also reduces Wg activity [26]. Endocytosis may also help to limit the distribution of Wg signal. In contrast to cells anterior to the Wg source, cells posterior to Wg-producing cells have much lower levels of Wg in endocytic vesicles, and this asymmetry in distribution mirrors the observation that Wg acts over a much shorter range towards the posterior than towards the anterior. This difference in Wg distribution appears to be due to rapid degradation of endocytosed Wg in posterior cells [27]. The spatially restricted pattern of Wg degradation is regulated by signals through the epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor that hasten the destruction of Wg in posterior cells [27].

Association of Wg with specific membrane microdomains also appears to play a role in controlling the distribution of Wg signals during Drosophila development. In imaginal discs, Wg is found in specialized membrane vesicles called argosomes, which are thought to be derived from lipid raft microdomains [28]. Incorporation of Wg into argosomes requires heparan sulfate proteoglycans, suggesting that proteoglycans play a role in sorting Wg to specialized membrane microdomains in Wg-producing cells or, alternatively, may play a role localizing Wg in distinct endocytic compartments in receiving cells.

Polarized distribution of wg transcripts in embryonic epithelial cells is also required for optimal signaling activity. High-resolution in situ hybridization analyses demonstrate that wg transcripts are localized apically in the embryonic epidermis and that this distribution is mediated by two cis-acting elements found in the 3' UTR of the wg mRNA [29]. Mutation of these elements results in uniform localization of wg transcripts and impaired Wg protein distribution and signaling. The asymmetric distribution of wg transcripts is dependent on dynein-mediated microtubule transport [30].

Function

Wnts and Wnt receptors

Reception and transduction of Wnt signals involves binding of Wnt proteins to members of two distinct families of cell-surface receptors, members of the Frizzled (Fzd) gene family and members of the LDL-receptor-related protein (LRP) family [31,32]. The canonical Fzd receptor has an amino-terminal cysteine-rich domain (CRD) that binds Wnt, seven transmembrane domains and a short cytoplasmic tail containing a consensus PDZ domain binding motif (S/T-X-V in the single-letter amino-acid code) at the carboxyl terminus. The CRD forms a novel protein fold with a conserved dimerization interface that may be important for Wnt binding [33]. Fzd receptors have been identified in vertebrates and invertebrates; there are ten known members in humans and mice, four in flies, and three in worms. The general structure of Fzd receptors resembles that of seven-transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors, suggesting that Fzd proteins may use heterotrimeric G proteins to transduce Wnt signals. Several recent studies provide evidence consistent with this idea, showing that a subgroup of Fzd receptors can signal through the pertussis-toxin-sensitive subclass of heterotrimeric G proteins to stimulate an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and activate protein kinase C (PKC) [34,35,36,37,38]. Heterotrimeric G proteins do not appear to be involved in transducing Wnt/Fzd signals that regulate the cytoskeleton-associated protein (β-catenin, however (see below).

Two members of the vertebrate LRP family, LRP-5 and LRP-6, can bind Wnts and may form a ternary complex with a Wnt and a Fzd [39]. Mutations in LRP-6 in mice result in developmental defects similar to those seen in mice deficient for several individual Wnt genes [40], and overexpression of LRP in Xenopus can activate the Wnt pathway [39]. In Drosophila, arrow, the ortholog of LRP5 and LRP6, is required for optimal Wg signaling [41]. Although the mechanism of LRP signaling is unclear, recent evidence suggests that binding of the cytoplasmic domain of LRP to the Wnt antagonist Axin may play a role in Wnt pathway activation [42].

In addition to the Fzd and LRP receptors, cell-surface proteoglycans also appear to have a role in the reception of Wnt signals. For example, genetic analyses in Drosophila have shown that several genes required for optimal Wg signaling encode cell-surface proteoglycans of the glypican family [43,44] and proteins involved in proteoglycan synthesis [45,46,47]. Furthermore, QSulf1, an avian protein related to heparan-specific N-acetyl glucosamine sulfatases, has also been shown to regulate heparan-dependent Wnt signaling in cultured cells [48]. It is unclear at this time how proteoglycans modulate Wnt signaling, but current suggestions include concentrating Wnt proteins at the cell surface or presenting Wnt ligands to cell-surface receptors.

Secreted modulators of Wnt signaling

Wnt signals are modulated extracellularly by diverse secreted proteins, including members of the Frizzled-related protein (FRP or FrzB) family [49], Wnt-inhibitory factor-1 (WIF-1) [50], Cerberus [51], and Dickkopf (Dkk) [52]. FRPs, WIF-1, and Cerberus can bind Wnt proteins directly and are thought to antagonize Wnt function by preventing their interaction with Fzd receptors. FRPs can also interact with Fzds, suggesting that a second way in which FRPs might antagonize Wnt signaling is through the formation of a nonfunctional complex with Fzd receptors. Humans have at least five FRP genes, and the specificity of each FRP for different Wnts remains to be determined. Dkk does not bind Wnts but instead interacts with the extracellular domain of LRPs, thereby blocking activation of Wnt signaling [42,53,54]. Four Dkk genes have been identified in vertebrates, including Dkk2, which does not act as a Wnt antagonist but rather can stimulate Wnt signaling [55].

Intracellular signaling pathways

Wnt signals are transduced through at least three distinct intracellular signaling pathways including the canonical 'Wnt/β-catenin' pathway, the 'Wnt/Ca2+' pathway, and the 'Wnt/polarity' pathway (also called the 'planar polarity' pathway) [5,56,57,58,59,60,61,62]. Distinct sets of Wnt and Fzd ligand-receptor pairs can activate each of these pathways and lead to unique cellular responses. The Wnt/β-catenin pathway primarily regulates cell fate determination during development, whereas the major function of the Wnt/polarity pathway is regulation of cytoskeletal organization. The biological function of the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway is unclear.

The canonical Wnt/β-catenin pathway is intensely studied, and on the basis of current literature I propose the model illustrated in Figure 3a [59,63,64]. Signaling through this pathway depends on the levels of β-catenin in the cell. In the absence of Wnt, β-catenin is targeted for degradation by a multi-protein destruction complex. Wnt signaling antagonizes the destruction complex, leading to the accumulation of β-catenin and activation of target genes. Up-to-date lists of proteins involved in Wnt/β-catenin signaling and the potential roles of each of these proteins can be found on the worldwide web [5,60,62].

thumbnailFigure 3. The known Wnt signaling pathways. (a) In the Wnt/β-catenin pathway, Wnt signaling depends on the steady-state levels of the multi-functional protein β-catenin. In the absence of Wnt signal, a multi-protein destruction complex that includes the adenomatous polyposis coli protein (APC) and a member of the Axin family facilitates the phosphorylation of β-catenin by glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3). GSK3 substrates also include APC and Axin; phosphorylation of each of these proteins leads to enhanced binding of β-catenin. Phosphorylated β-catenin is bound by the F-box protein β-TrCP, a component of an E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, and is ubiquitinated; the ubiquitin tag marks β-catenin for destruction by the proteasome. When a cell is exposed to a Wnt, the Wnt interacts with its coreceptors Frizzled and LRP. Activation of Frizzled and LRP leads to the phosphorylation of Dishevelled (Dsh), a cytoplasmic scaffold protein, perhaps through stimulation of casein kinase Iε (CKIε) and/or casein kinase II (CKII). Dsh then functions through its interaction with Axin to antagonize GSK3, preventing the phosphorylation and ubiquitination of β-catenin. In vertebrates, inhibition of GSK3 may involve the activity of GSK3 binding protein (GBP/Frat), which binds to both Dsh and GSK3 and can promote dissociation of GSK3 from the destruction complex. Unphosphorylated β-catenin escapes degradation, accumulates in the cell, and enters the nucleus, where it interacts with members of the TCF/LEF family of HMG-domain transcription factors to stimulate expression of target genes. In addition to the components of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway described here, many additional proteins with potential roles in regulating Wnt/β-catenin signaling have been reported including the phosphatase PP2A and the kinases Akt/protein kinase B, integrin-linked kinase (ILK), and PKC. (b) Signaling through the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway appears to involve activation of the two pertussis-toxin-sensitive G proteins, Gαo and G.αt, in combination with Gβ2 [34,35]. G-protein activation then leads to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and the subsequent stimulation of Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CamKII) [37]. Activation of the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway also results in stimulation of PKC activity in the form of the translocation of PKC to the plasma membrane [34]. Downstream targets of the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway have not been identified. (c) The Wnt/polarity pathway, which regulates cytoskeletal organization; the Drosophila Wnt/polarity pathway that regulates the polarity of trichomes in the wing is shown as an example. In this case, the nature of the polarity signal is not known.

The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway involves an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and activation of PKC; it can be activated by a distinct group of Wnt ligands and Fzd receptors from those that activate other pathways, including Wnt5a, Wnt11 and Fzd2 (Figure 3b) [58,61,62]. The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway involves activation of a heterotrimeric G protein, an increase in intracellular Ca2+, and activation of calcium/calmodulin-regulated kinase II (CamKII) and PKC [34,35,37]. The downstream targets of CamKII and PKC are currently unknown, but it has been shown that activation of the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway can antagonize the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in Xenopus, although it is unclear at what level this interaction occurs [65].

Wnt/polarity signaling regulates the polarity of cells through regulation of their cytoskeletal organization (Figure 3c) [56,57,62]. In vertebrates, Wnt/polarity signaling is thought to control polarized cell movements during gastrulation and neurulation [66,67,68,69,70]. In Drosophila, Wnt/polarity signaling is required for the appropriate orientation of trichomes - or hairs - of the adult wing and for appropriate chirality of ommatidia in the eye, and may regulate asymmetric cell divisions of certain neuroblasts [56,71,72]. The only molecules known to function in both the vertebrate and the invertebrate Wnt/polarity pathways are members of the Fzd family and the cytoplasmic scaffold protein Dsh. The regulation of gastrulation movements in vertebrates also requires the activity of Wnt11, which may signal through Fzd7 to regulate protrusive activity during convergent extension [66,67]. In flies, genetic analyses have identified a number of potential components of the Wnt/polarity pathway in addition to DFzd1 and Dsh, including the small GTPase DrhoA, Drosophila rho-associated kinase (Drok), Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), myosin II, myosin VIIA, and the products of the novel genes flamingo/starry night, fuzzy, inturned, and strabismus/van gogh [56,72]. A Wnt ligand for the Wnt/polarity pathway has not been identified in flies, however, and it remains to be seen how much of the intracellular signaling mechanism has been conserved between vertebrates and invertebrates.

Several studies have suggested that distinct classes of Wnts signal through either the Wnt/β-catenin pathway or the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway [58]; for example, overexpression studies in Xenopus have shown that XWnt1, XWnt3a, XWnt8, and XWnt8b can stimulate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway whereas XWnt4, XWnt5a, and XWnt11 can stimulate the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway [58]. Furthermore, the separation of Wnts into these two distinct functional classes is mirrored by the classification of Fzd proteins into similar functional groups on the basis of their ability to activate one or other pathway in overexpression assays. Although this classification of Wnts, which partially mirrors their evolutionary relationships, may provide a useful tool for predicting the function of Wnts and Fzds, the relationship between specific Wnts and the intracellular pathway they use is not fixed. For example, overexpression of XWnt5a in combination with human FZD5 in Xenopus embryos results in activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway [73], suggesting that the activity of Wnts in vivo will be determined by the repertoire of Fzd receptors present at the cell surface.

Important mutants and developmental functions

Loss-of-function mutations in 9 of the 18 mouse Wnt genes have been generated, and the phenotypes of mutant embryos demonstrate the diverse functions of Wnt genes during embryogenesis (Table 2). For example, knocking out Wnt1 results in a dramatic loss of a portion of the midbrain and deletion of the rostral cerebellum [74,75]. Inactivation of Wnt4 results in the absence of kidneys [76], masculinization of mutant females (absence of the Müllerian duct and continued development of the Wolffian duct) [77], and defects in mammary gland morphogenesis during pregnancy [78]. Targeted knockout of Wnt7a also has pleiotropic effects, including ventralization of the limbs [79], female infertility due to failure of Müllerian-duct regression [80], and a delay in the morphological maturation of glomerular rosettes in the cerebellum [81].

Table 2. Developmental functions of mouse Wnt genes

Overexpression and antisense 'knockdown' analyses in Xenopus have shown that the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is required for the specification of dorsal cell fates [82]. A debate is ongoing, however, over whether a maternal Wnt ligand is required to activate this pathway in dorsal cells. In support of a role for a Wnt ligand, a recent study has shown that XFzd7 is important for establishing dorsal cell fates [83], thereby implicating a Wnt ligand in this process. Furthermore, targeted knockout of Wnt3 in mice results in defects in axis formation and gastrulation, suggesting a conserved role for Wnts in regulating the establishment of the dorsal-ventral axis in vertebrates [84]. On the other hand, overexpression of a dominant-negative form of Xwnt8 in oocytes does not suppress formation of dorsal cell fates, arguing against the requirement for a maternal Wnt in axis specification [10]. Further studies are necessary to resolve the role of Wnts in vertebrate early axial development.

In flies, Wnt signaling has a variety of functions during development. The wg gene is required for cell-fate choices in the ventral epidermis during embryogenesis, as well as for many other functions, and DWnt2 is required for testis and adult muscle development [17]. In C. elegans, genetic analyses have defined a number of roles for Wnts, including establishment of polarity and endodermal cell fates in the early embryo and regulation of cell migration, among many others [85]. A comprehensive list of Wnt genes and their mutant phenotypes in vertebrates and invertebrates can be found at the Wnt gene homepage [5].

Wnt signaling and cancer

In addition to the many roles for Wnt signaling during development and in adult tissues, it is also involved in tumorigenesis in humans [59,64]. Although mutation or misexpression of a Wnt gene has not been linked directly to cancer in humans, mutation of several intracellular components of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway is thought to be critical in many forms of cancer. Most notably, patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) develop multiple intestinal adenomas early in life and have germline mutations in the APC gene. In addition, mutation of APC is associated with more than 80% of sporadic colorectal adenomas and carcinomas. More than 95% of germline and somatic mutations of the APC gene are nonsense mutations that result in the synthesis of a truncated protein lacking the region of APC that is important for its function in the destruction complex. Significantly, these truncations in APC remove binding sites for β-catenin and Axin, as well as putative phosphorylation sites for GSK3; as a result, the mutant APC protein cannot efficiently promote degradation of β-catenin. Mutations in the third exon of the human β-catenin gene (CTNNb1) that make it refractory to phosphorylation-dependent degradation and lead to inappropriate accumulation of β-catenin have also been identified in a large number of primary human cancers (see [64] for a table of β-catenin mutations in human cancers). Interestingly, mutations in CTNNb1 and APC are rarely found in the same tumor; for example, in colon cancer, in which the vast majority of tumors have mutations in APC, the overall frequency of CTNNb1 mutations is relatively low, but colorectal tumors lacking APC mutations are much more likely to have mutations in CTNNb1. Recently, Axin has also been shown to act as a tumor suppressor; mutations in the Axin1 gene have been found in human hepatocellular cancers [86]. Importantly, mutations in Axin1 and CTNNb1 found in hepatocellular carcinomas also show mutual exclusivity similar to that seen for APC and CTNNb1 in colon cancers. Together, these data strongly argue that mutations resulting in the stabilization of β-catenin can promote cancer in many tissue types.

Frontiers

The large number of Wnt genes and the many roles that Wnt signaling plays in development and human disease pose many unresolved issues for researchers. One of the major unanswered questions is the specificity of interactions between different Wnt ligands and Fzd receptors and also which downstream pathways these many different ligand-receptor pairs stimulate. It also remains unclear how Wnt signals are transduced by the Fzd-LRP receptor complex and what role proteoglycans play in this process. Inside the cell, many questions regarding the transduction of Wnt signals remain, including how receptor activation stimulates Dsh and how Dsh discriminates between different Wnt signals to activate either the Wnt/β-catenin or the Wnt/polarity pathway. Furthermore, many roles of Wnts during development remain to be determined. This challenge will require detailed analyses of knockout mice, in addition to biochemical, cell-biological and genetic analyses in other model systems, to characterize the functions of Wnts and the signaling pathways they use during embryogenesis. Finally, the identification and characterization of mutations in Wnt-pathway genes involved in human disease is ongoing and these studies, together with a greater knowledge of the molecular mechanism of Wnt signal transduction, promise future clinical therapies for devastating human afflictions such as colon cancer. Thus, although there is so much still to learn, the importance and widespread occurrence of Wnt signaling guarantees the rapid increase in our understanding of the normal and abnormal functions of the Wnts.

References

  1. The Genome Database [http://gdbwww.gdb.org/gdb/] webcite
  2. SOURCE [http://genome-www4.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/SMD/source/sourceSearch] webcite
  3. GenBank [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/index.html] webcite
  4. GeneCards [http://genome-www.stanford.edu/genecards/index.html] webcite
  5. The Wnt gene homepage [http://www.stanford.edu/~rnusse/wntwindow.html] webcite
  6. LocusLink [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/LocusLink] webcite
  7. Nusse R: An ancient cluster of Wnt paralogues.

    Trends Genet 2001, 17:443. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper discusses the conserved arrangement of a group of Wnt genes in the human and Drosophila genomes.

  8. Entrez Genome View [http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/Entrez/hum_srch?chr=hum_chr.inf&query] webcite
  9. Du SJ, Purcell SM, Christian JL, McGrew LL, Moon RT: Identification of distinct classes and functional domains of Wnts through expression of wild-type and chimeric proteins in Xenopus embryos.

    Mol Cell Biol 1995, 15:2625-2634. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

    The authors investigated whether distinct domains of XWnt8 and XWnt5a were required to elicit distinct functions. They found that the carboxy-terminal of these Wnts were sufficient to produce specific phenotypes and marker gene expression.

  10. Hoppler S, Brown JD, Moon RT: Expression of a dominant-negative Wnt blocks induction of MyoD in Xenopus embryos.

    Genes Dev 1996, 10:2805-2817. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

    This paper shows that expression of a carboxy-terminal truncation mutant of XWnt8 acts as a dominant-negative in early Xenopus embryos, in a cell non-autonomous manner, suggesting that it might act by preventing the association of wild-type XWnt8 with its receptor.

  11. Dierick H, Bejsovec A: Cellular mechanisms of wingless/Wnt signal transduction.

    Curr Top Dev Biol 1999, 43:153-190. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

    A comprehensive review of Wnt signal transduction, focusing on the signaling mechanism of Drosophila Wg.

  12. van den Heuvel M, Harryman-Samos C, Klingensmith J, Perrimon N, Nusse R: Mutations in the segment polarity genes wingless and porcupine impair secretion of the Wingless protein.

    EMBO J 1993, 12:5293-5302. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

    Several embryonic-lethal alleles of wg produce mutant Wg protein that is retained inside producing cells. A similar abnormal distribution of wild-type Wg protein was also seen in embryos mutant for the segment polarity gene porcupine suggesting that Porcupine plays a role in regulating Wg biosynthesis or secretion.

  13. Cadigan KM, Nusse R: wingless signaling in the Drosophila eye and embryonic epidermis.

    Development 1996, 122:2801-2812. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Shows that Wg acts in a paracrine manner and that porcupine is required in mediating Wg signaling.

  14. Kadowaki T, Wilder E, Klingensmith J, Zachary K, Perrimon N: The segment polarity gene porcupine encodes a putative multi-transmembrane protein involved in wingless processing.

    Genes Dev 1996, 10:3116-3128. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

    The authors present the cloning and sequence of the porcupine gene and show that the Porcupine protein localizes to the endoplasmic reticulum and plays a role in the biosynthetic processing of Wg.

  15. Rocheleau CE, Downs WD, Lin R, Wittmann C, Bei Y, Cha YH, Ali M, Priess JR, Mello CC: Wnt signaling and an APC-related gene specify endoderm in early C. elegans embryos.

    Cell 1997, 90:707-716. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    See [16].

  16. Thorpe CJ, Schlesinger A, Carter JC, Bowerman B: Wnt signaling polarizes an early C. elegans blastomere to distinguish endoderm from mesoderm.

    Cell 1997, 90:695-705. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Data in this paper and [15] demonstrate a requirement for Wnt signaling in the determination of the endodermal lineage in early C. elegans embryos. In addition to the role of Wnt in cell fate determination, Thorpe et al. also describe a role for Wnt in regulating mitotic spindle orientation in the early embryo.

  17. Cadigan KM, Nusse R: Wnt signaling: a common theme in animal development.

    Genes Dev 1997, 11:3286-3305. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    A comprehensive review discussing the role of Wnt signaling during development, focusing on the function of Wnt genes in development and the molecular mechanism of Wnt signal transduction.

  18. Mason JO, Kitajewski J, Varmus HE: Mutational analysis of mouse Wnt-1 identifies two temperature-sensitive alleles and attributes of Wnt-1 protein essential for transformation of a mammary cell line.

    Mol Biol Cell 1992, 3:521-533. PubMed Abstract | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

    Shows that mutation of all four potential glycosylation sites in Wnt1 does not abolish its ability to promote transformation of C57MG mouse mammary epithelial cells.

  19. Bradley RS, Brown AM: The proto-oncogene int-1 encodes a secreted protein associated with the extracellular matrix.

    EMBO J 1990, 9:1569-1575. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

    The authors expressed int-1 (Wnt1) in fibroblasts and found that it could not be detected in the culture medium but instead was found in tight association with the extracellular matrix. They also presented evidence that Wnt1 can bind heparin in vitro, suggesting that Wnt proteins may associate with glycosaminoglycans.

  20. Reichsman F, Smith L, Cumberledge S: Glycosaminoglycans can modulate extracellular localization of the wingless protein and promote signal transduction.

    J Cell Biol 1996, 135:819-827. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

    This paper presents evidence that Wg protein associates with glycosaminoglycans (heparan sulfate and chondroitin sulfate) on the surface of producing and receiving cells. In addition, perturbation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis was found to greatly reduce Wg signaling, suggesting that glycosaminoglycans are required for optimal Wnt signaling.

  21. Shibamoto S, Higano K, Takada R, Ito F, Takeichi M, Takada S: Cytoskeletal reorganization by soluble Wnt-3a protein signaling.

    Genes Cells 1998, 3:659-670. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Takada and colleagues describe the production and activity of Wnt3a-conditioned media, a source of soluble Wnt protein that can be used in different experimental analyses.

  22. van Leeuwen F, Samos CH, Nusse R: Biological activity of soluble wingless protein in cultured Drosophila imaginal disc cells.

    Nature 1994, 368:342-344. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper describes the production of Wg-conditioned media, showing that Wg, and by analogy other Wnt proteins, can act as soluble extracellular signaling molecules.

  23. van den Heuvel M, Nusse R, Johnston P, Lawrence PA: Distribution of the wingless gene product in Drosophila embryos: a protein involved in cell-cell communication.

    Cell 1989, 59:739-749. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The authors demonstrate that Wg protein can be found in producing cells, in intercellular regions in association with the plasma membrane, and in multi-vesicular bodies inside Wg responding cells. The latter observation suggests that endocytosis of Wg may play a role in Wnt signaling (see [24]).

  24. Gonzalez F, Swales L, Bejsovec A, Skaer H, Martinez Arias A: Secretion and movement of wingless protein in the epidermis of the Drosophila embryo.

    Mech Dev 1991, 35:43-54. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The Wg protein can be found several cell diameters from its source, indicating that it is a secreted protein that can act at a distance from producing cells. In addition, it was found that Wg can be endocytosed by receiving cells.

  25. Bejsovec A, Wieschaus E: Signaling activities of the Drosophila wingless gene are separately mutable and appear to be transduced at the cell surface.

    Genetics 1995, 139:309-320. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

    Data in this paper and [26] demonstrate that inhibition of endocytosis compromises Wg signaling and perturbs Wg distribution. Together these data indicate that internalization of Wnt ligands may play a critical role in controlling activation of downstream signaling and governing the range of action of Wnt ligands.

  26. Moline MM, Southern C, Bejsovec A: Directionality of wingless protein transport influences epidermal patterning in the Drosophila embryo.

    Development 1999, 126:4375-4384. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    See [25].

  27. Dubois L, Lecourtois M, Alexandre C, Hirst E, Vincent JP: Regulated endocytic routing modulates wingless signaling in Drosophila embryos.

    Cell 2001, 105:613-624. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Regulated lysosomal degradation of Wg protein is one mechanism that functions to control the distribution of active Wg ligand, and activation of the epidermal growth factor receptor facilitates degradation of Wg.

  28. Greco V, Hannus M, Eaton S: Argosomes: a potential vehicle for the spread of morphogens through epithelia.

    Cell 2001, 106:633-645. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper describes a novel endocytic compartment in Drosophila embryos termed argosomes that may represent a specialized exovesicle important for transcytosis and movement of signaling molecules through epithelia. Wg protein was found to co-localize with argosomes, suggesting that argosomes may represent a novel vehicle for the transport of Wnt ligands through epithelia.

  29. Simmonds AJ, dosSantos G, Livne-Bar I, Krause HM: Apical localization of wingless transcripts is required for wingless signaling.

    Cell 2001, 105:197-207. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Using high-resolution in situ hybridization analyses, the authors show that wingless transcripts are apically localized in several tissues during Drosophila development. This polarized distribution was dependent on two cis-acting elements found in the 3' UTR of the wingless transcript. Mutation of these elements resulted in mis-localization Wg protein as well as a reduction in Wg signaling activity.

  30. Wilkie GS, Davis I: Drosophila wingless and pair-rule transcripts localize apically by dynein-mediated transport of RNA particles.

    Cell 2001, 105:209-219. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper demonstrates that wingless transcripts assemble into cytoplasmic particles that are transported to apical regions of the cell via microtubules and dynein motors.

  31. Bejsovec A: Wnt signaling: an embarrassment of receptors.

    Curr Biol 2000, 10:R919-R922. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review and [32] discuss the recent identification of LRP as a Wnt co-receptor.

  32. Pandur P, Kuhl M: An arrow for wingless to take-off.

    BioEssays 2001, 23:207-210. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    See [31].

  33. Dann CE, Hsieh JC, Rattner A, Sharma D, Nathans J, Leahy DJ: Insights into Wnt binding and signaling from the structures of two Frizzled cysteine-rich domains.

    Nature 2001, 412:86-90. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The structure of the cysteine-rich domains (CRDs) of mouse Fzd8 and secreted Fzd-related protein 3 (sFRP3). The CRD was shown to form a novel protein fold, and the design and interpretation of CRD mutations identified a Wnt-binding site. The CRDs were also found to exhibit a conserved dimer interface that may be a feature of Wnt signaling.

  34. Sheldahl LC, Park M, Malbon CC, Moon RT: Protein kinase C is differentially stimulated by Wnt and Frizzled homologs in a G-protein-dependent manner.

    Curr Biol 1999, 9:695-698. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper builds on a previous observation that signaling by Wnt5a and Fzd2 leads to an increase in intracellular Ca2+ and demonstrates that Wnt5a and Fzd2 also activate PKC in Xenopus embryos. The authors also show that distinct subsets Wnt ligands and Fzd receptors stimulate either the Wnt/Ca2+ or the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in Xenopus.

  35. Liu X, Liu T, Slusarski DC, Yang-Snyder J, Malbon CC, Moon RT, Wang H: Activation of a frizzled-2/beta-adrenergic receptor chimera promotes Wnt signaling and differentiation of mouse F9 teratocarcinoma cells via Gαo and Gαt2.

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:14383-14388. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

    The authors engineered a rat Fzd2 chimera responsive to β-adrenergic agonist by fusing the ligand-binding domains of the β(2)-adrenergic receptor to the intracellular loops of Fzd2. Isoproterenol-induced activation of the Fzd2 chimera in F9 embryonic teratocarcinoma cells was blocked by pertussis toxin and by oligodeoxynucleotide antisense to Gαo, Gαt2 and Gβ2 demonstrating the involvement of two pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins for signaling by the Fzd2 receptor.

  36. Liu T, Liu X, Wang H, Moon RT, Malbon CC: Activation of rat frizzled-1 promotes Wnt signaling and differentiation of mouse F9 teratocarcinoma cells via pathways that require Galpha(q) and Galpha(o) function.

    J Biol Chem 1999, 274:33539-33544. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper demonstrated that stimulation of F9 teratocarcinoma cells expressing rat Fzd1 with Xenopus Wnt8-conditioned media results in differentiation of the cells into primitive endoderm. Fzd1/Wnt8-dependent differentiation could be blocked by pertussis toxin, depletion of Gαq or Gαo, inhibition of PKC, and inhibition of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), suggesting that signaling by Fzd1 in F9 cells involves activation of heterotrimeric G-proteins, PKC and MAPK.

  37. Kuhl M, Sheldahl LC, Malbon CC, Moon RT: Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II is stimulated by Wnt and Frizzled homologs and promotes ventral cell fates in Xenopus.

    J Biol Chem 2000, 275:12701-12711. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper demonstrates that expression of a subset of Wnt ligands (Wnt5a and Wnt11) and Fzd receptors (including rat Fzd2) in Xenopus embryos leads to the stimulation of CamKII. Using chimeric β-adrenergic/Fzd2 receptors, the authors also show that activation of CamKII occurs within 10 minutes following receptor stimulation and is sensitive to pertussis toxin.

  38. Liu T, DeCostanzo AJ, Liu X, Wang H, Hallagan S, Moon RT, Malbon CC: G protein signaling from activated rat frizzled-1 to the beta-catenin-Lef-Tcf pathway.

    Science 2001, 292:1718-1722. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper shows that stimulation of a chimeric β-adrenergic/rat Fzd1 receptor expressed in mouse F9 teratocarcinoma cells with isoproterenol results in the stabilization of β-catenin and activation of a β-catenin-responsive reporter gene. Both of these effects could be blocked by pertussis toxin, indicating that heterotrimeric G proteins may be involved in transducing signals from Fzd1 to the Wnt/β-catenin pathway.

  39. Tamai K, Semenov M, Kato Y, Spokony R, Liu C, Katsuyama Y, Hess F, Saint-Jeannet JP, He X: LDL-receptor-related proteins in Wnt signal transduction.

    Nature 2000, 407:530-535. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The authors demonstrate that LRP6 can act as a Wnt receptor in Xenopus embryos. Overexpression of LRP6 in Xenopus resulted in axis duplication and activation of Wnt-responsive genes while overexpression of a truncated form of LRP6 blocked Wnt activity in the same assays. Furthermore, LRP6 can bind Wnt and interacts with Fzd in a Wnt-dependent manner.

  40. Pinson KI, Brennan J, Monkley S, Avery BJ, Skarnes WC: An LDL-receptor-related protein mediates Wnt signalling in mice.

    Nature 2000, 407:535-538. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper provides evidence that LRP6 can act as a Wnt receptor in mice. Embryos homozygous for a mutation in the LRP6 gene exhibit developmental defects that are a striking composite of those caused by mutations in individual Wnt genes. Furthermore, the authors show a genetic enhancement of the vestigial tail (Wnt3a) phenotype in mice lacking one functional copy of LRP6.

  41. Wehrli M, Dougan ST, Caldwell K, O'Keefe L, Schwartz S, Vaizel-Ohayon D, Schejter E, Tomlinson A, DiNardo S: arrow encodes an LDL-receptor-related protein essential for Wingless signalling.

    Nature 2000, 407:527-530. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper demonstrates that the arrow gene is necessary for all Wg signaling events in Drosophila. The authors also provide genetic evidence that arrow gene function is essential in cells receiving Wg input and that it acts upstream of Dsh.

  42. Mao J, Wang J, Liu B, Pan W, Farr GH 3rd, Flynn C, Yuan H, Takada S, Kimelman D, Li L, et al.: Low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein-5 binds to Axin and regulates the canonical Wnt signaling pathway.

    Mol Cell 2001, 7:801-809. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper shows that the intracellular domain of LRP5 binds Axin. Wnt signals were found to cause recruitment of Axin to the membrane and enhanced the interaction of Axin with LRP5. Together, these data suggest that activation of the Wnt/β-catenin pathway may involve direct interaction of Axin with the Wnt receptor complex.

  43. Lin X, Perrimon N: Dally cooperates with Drosophila Frizzled 2 to transduce Wingless signalling.

    Nature 1999, 400:281-284. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The authors show that mutation of dally, a member of the glypican family of heparan sulfate proteoglycans, results in phenotypes similar to partial loss of wingless function. Loss of dally was also found to enhance loss-of-function DFzd2 phenotype.

  44. Tsuda M, Kamimura K, Nakato H, Archer M, Staatz W, Fox B, Humphrey M, Olson S, Futch T, Kaluza V, et al.: The cell-surface proteoglycan Dally regulates Wingless signalling in Drosophila.

    Nature 1999, 400:276-280. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    Similar to the results reported in [43] this paper describes genetic evidence that dally plays a role in the reception of Wg signals.

  45. Binari RC, Staveley BE, Johnson WA, Godavarti R, Sasisekharan R, Manoukian AS: Genetic evidence that heparin-like glycosaminoglycans are involved in wingless signaling.

    Development 1997, 124:2623-2632. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper shows that injection of heparinase into Drosophila embryos results in the degradation of heparin-like glycosaminoglycans and a wingless-like cuticular phenotype, suggesting the proteoglycans are involved in Wnt signaling.

  46. Hacker U, Lin X, Perrimon N: The Drosophila sugarless gene modulates Wingless signaling and encodes an enzyme involved in polysaccharide biosynthesis.

    Development 1997, 124:3565-3573. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper describes genetic evidence that the sugarless gene, a Drosophila homolog of vertebrate UDP-glucose dehydrogenase, is required for optimal Wg signaling. UDP-glucose dehydrogenase is essential for the biosynthesis of various proteoglycans, suggesting that proteoglycans play an important role in the production or reception of Wnt signals.

  47. Haerry TE, Heslip TR, Marsh JL, O'Connor MB: Defects in glucuronate biosynthesis disrupt Wingless signaling in Drosophila.

    Development 1997, 124:3055-3064. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The authors describe the identification and characterization of the Drosophila suppenkasper (ska) gene that encodes a UDP-glucose dehydrogenase required for production of glucuronic acid. Genetic analyses show that the phenotype ska mutant embryos resemble that of wingless deficient embryos and that ska interacts with both wingless and dishevelled.

  48. Dhoot GK, Gustafsson MK, Ai X, Sun W, Standiford DM, Emerson CP Jr: Regulation of Wnt signaling and embryo patterning by an extracellular sulfatase.

    Science 2001, 293:1663-1666. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The identification of QSulf1, an avian ortholog of an evolutionarily conserved protein family related to heparan-specific N-acetyl glucosamine sulfatases. In cultured C2C12 myogenic progenitor cells QSulf1 was found to facilitate Wnt signaling, suggesting that QSulf1 can modulate Wnt signals by desulfation of cell-surface proteoglycans.

  49. Moon RT, Brown JD, Yang-Snyder JA, Miller JR: Structurally related receptors and antagonists compete for secreted Wnt ligands.

    Cell 1997, 88:725-728. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This minireview summarizes the discovery and function of FRPs with a focus on the role of FRPs during early Xenopus development.

  50. Hsieh JC, Kodjabachian L, Rebbert ML, Rattner A, Smallwood PM, Samos CH, Nusse R, Dawid IB, Nathans J: A new secreted protein that binds to Wnt proteins and inhibits their activities.

    Nature 1999, 398:431-436. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The authors describe the identification of Wnt-inhibitory factor 1 (WIF-1), a secreted Wnt antagonist, and show that overexpression of WIF-1 in Xenopus embryos perturbs somitogenesis.

  51. Piccolo S, Agius E, Leyns L, Bhattacharyya S, Grunz H, Bouwmeester T, De Robertis EM: The head inducer Cerberus is a multifunctional antagonist of Nodal, BMP and Wnt signals.

    Nature 1999, 397:707-710. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper shows that the Cerberus protein can bind to Nodal, BMP and Wnt proteins via independent sites, suggesting that it functions as a multivalent growth-factor antagonist. Based on overexpression experiments in Xenopus, the authors propose that Cerberus functions to block Nodal, BMP, and Wnt signals involved in trunk formation thereby promoting head formation in anterior regions of the embryo.

  52. Nusse R: Developmental biology. Making head or tail of Dickkopf.

    Nature 2001, 411:255-256. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This comment article summarizes data presented in [53].

  53. Bafico A, Liu G, Yaniv A, Gazit A, Aaronson SA: Novel mechanism of Wnt signalling inhibition mediated by Dickkopf-1 interaction with LRP6/Arrow.

    Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3:683-686. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper demonstrates that Dickkopf-1 (Dkk1), a secreted Wnt antagonist, blocks Wnt signaling by binding to the extracellular domain of the Wnt receptors LRP5 and LRP6.

  54. Semenov MV, Tamai K, Brott BK, Kuhl M, Sokol S, He X: Head inducer Dickkopf-1 is a ligand for Wnt coreceptor LRP6.

    Curr Biol 2001, 11:951-961. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The authors show that Dickkopf-1 (Dkk-1) is a high-affinity LRP6 ligand that inhibits Wnt signaling by blocking Wnt-induced Fzd-LRP6 complex formation.

  55. Wu W, Glinka A, Delius H, Niehrs C: Mutual antagonism between dickkopf1 and dickkopf2 regulates Wnt/beta-catenin signalling.

    Curr Biol 2000, 10:1611-1614. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper shows that dickkopf2 (Dkk2) and Wnt act synergistically in Xenopus embryos to activate the Wnt/β-catenin pathway. Thus, unlike other members of the DKK family that act as Wnt antagonists, Dkk2 appears to function as a stimulatory co-factor for Wnt signaling.

  56. Adler PN, Lee H: Frizzled signaling and cell-cell interactions in planar polarity.

    Curr Opin Cell Biol 2001, 13:635-640. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review provides a current summary of the role of Fzd and Dsh in regulating planar polarity during Drosophila development.

  57. Boutros M, Mlodzik M: Dishevelled: at the crossroads of divergent intracellular signaling pathways.

    Mech Dev 1999, 83:27-37. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review provides a summary of the function of Dsh in Wnt signaling and discusses how Dsh discriminates between different Wnt inputs to modulate distinct downstream cellular responses.

  58. Kuhl M, Sheldahl LC, Park M, Miller JR, Moon RT: The Wnt/Ca2+ pathway: a new vertebrate Wnt signaling pathway takes shape.

    Trends Genet 2000, 16:279-283. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review provides a synopsis of our current understanding of the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway and presents an interesting table describing the apparent mutually exclusive ability of different Fzd receptors to stimulate either the Wnt/β-catenin or Wnt/Ca2+ pathways.

  59. Miller JR, Hocking AM, Brown JD, Moon RT: Mechanism and function of signal transduction by the Wnt/beta-catenin and Wnt/Ca2+ pathways.

    Oncogene 1999, 18:7860-7872. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review provides a detailed summary of our current understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying signaling through the Wnt/β-catenin or Wnt/Ca2+ pathways. Particular attention is paid to the function and regulation of the Axin/APC/GSK3 destruction complex and the involvement of Wnt pathway genes in human cancer.

  60. Science's STKE Connections Map [http://stke.sciencemag.org/cm/] webcite
  61. A Pond in Seattle: Xenopus and Zebrafish Research in the lab of Dr. Randall Moon [http://faculty.washington.edu/rtmoon/] webcite
  62. Wnt World [http://www.gcd.med.umn.edu/millerlab/Wnt/wntworld.html] webcite
  63. Wodarz A, Nusse R: Mechanisms of Wnt signaling in development.

    Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 1998, 14:59-88. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review provides a comprehensive view of the role of Wnt signaling during development.

  64. Polakis P: Wnt signaling and cancer.

    Genes Dev 2000, 14:1837-1851. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review provides an excellent synopsis of our current understanding of the role of Wnt signaling in human cancer. It also contains a table describing β-catenin mutations found in various human cancers.

  65. Torres MA, Yang-Snyder JA, Purcell SM, DeMarais AA, McGrew LL, Moon RT: Activities of the Wnt-1 class of secreted signaling factors are antagonized by the Wnt-5A class and by a dominant negative cadherin in early Xenopus development.

    J Cell Biol 1996, 133:1123-1137. PubMed Abstract OpenURL

    The authors demonstrate that overexpression of XWnt5a can inhibit signaling by Xwnt8 in Xenopus embryos through a mechanism that may involve changes in cell-cell adhesion.

  66. Heisenberg CP, Tada M, Rauch GJ, Saude L, Concha ML, Geisler R, Stemple DL, Smith JC, Wilson SW: Silberblick/Wnt11 mediates convergent extension movements during zebrafish gastrulation.

    Nature 2000, 405:76-81. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper describes the characterization of the silberblick/Wnt11 gene in zebrafish. The authors demonstrate that silberblick/Wnt11 is required for convergent-extension movements and that overexpression of a truncated form of Dsh active in Wnt/polarity signaling but not Wnt/β-catenin signaling can compensate for the loss of silberblick/Wnt11 function.

  67. Tada M, Smith JC: Xwnt11 is a target of Xenopus Brachyury: regulation of gastrulation movements via Dishevelled, but not through the canonical Wnt pathway.

    Development 2000, 127:2227-2238. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    The authors demonstrate that overexpression of a dominant-negative form of XWnt11 in Xenopus embryos inhibits convergent extension movements. Co-expression of wild-type Dsh or a truncated form of Dsh that cannot signal through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway can overcome this inhibitory effect.

  68. Wallingford JB, Rowning BA, Vogeli KM, Rothbacher U, Fraser SE, Harland RM: Dishevelled controls cell polarity during Xenopus gastrulation.

    Nature 2000, 405:81-85. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper demonstrates that overexpression of a truncated form of Dsh that inhibits Wnt/Polarity signaling, but not Wnt/β-catenin signaling, disrupts convergent extension movements in Xenopus. The authors provide a detailed analysis of the effects of the truncated form of Dsh on cell movements and demonstrate that Dsh regulates the polarization of cells along the medial-lateral axis as well as the dynamics and polarity of cellular protrusions during gastrulation.

  69. Marsden M, DeSimone DW: Regulation of cell polarity, radial intercalation and epiboly in Xenopus : novel roles for integrin and fibronectin.

    Development 2001, 128:3635-3647. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper shows that integrin-dependent binding of blastocoel roof cells to fibronectin is sufficient to drive membrane localization of Dsh-GFP, suggesting that a convergence of integrin and Wnt signaling pathways acts to regulate morphogenesis in Xenopus embryos.

  70. Wallingford JB, Harland RM: Xenopus Dishevelled signaling regulates both neural and mesodermal convergent extension: parallel forces elongating the body axis.

    Development 2001, 128:2581-2592. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This paper shows that spatially restricted expression of Dsh mutants that block Wnt/Polarity signaling, but not Wnt/β-catenin signaling, to neural or mesodermal tissues inhibited either neural or mesodermal convergent extension. Targeted expression of other Wnt signaling antagonists also inhibited neural convergent extension in whole embryos without affecting cell fate, suggesting that Wnt/Polarity signaling regulates morphogenesis of both mesodermal and neural tissues during vertebrate development.

  71. Adler PN, Taylor J: Asymmetric cell division: plane but not simple.

    Curr Biol 2001, 11:R233-R236. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review discusses the role of Fzd receptors in the regulation of asymmetric cell divisions in Drosophila embryos.

  72. Strutt D: Planar polarity: getting ready to ROCK.

    Curr Biol 2001, 11:R506-R509. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

    This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of how Fzd and Dsh regulate planar polarity in Drosophila focusing on the role of the rho-associated kinase ROCK in this process.

  73. He X, Saint-Jeannet JP, Wang Y, Nathans J, Dawid I, Varmus H: A member of the Frizzled protein family mediating axis induction by Wnt-5A.

    Science 1997, 275: