Genome Biology Volume 3 Issue 11 |
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 ResearchWithin the fold: assessing differential expression measures and reproducibility in microarray assaysIvana V Yang1, Emily Chen1, Jeremy P Hasseman1, Wei Liang1, Bryan C Frank1, Shuibang Wang1, Vasily Sharov1, Alexander I Saeed1, Joseph White1, Jerry Li1, Norman H Lee1, Timothy J Yeatman2 and John Quackenbush1  1The Institute for Genomic Research, 9712 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD 20850, USA 2H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA author email corresponding author email
Genome Biology 2002,
3:research0062.1-0062.12doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-11-research0062
|
|
| Published: |
24 October 2002 |
Subject areas: Methods, Genome studies, Bioinformatics Abstract
Background
'Fold-change' cutoffs have been widely used in microarray assays to identify genes that are differentially expressed between query and reference samples. More accurate measures of differential expression and effective data-normalization strategies are required to identify high-confidence sets of genes with biologically meaningful changes in transcription. Further, the analysis of a large number of expression profiles is facilitated by a common reference sample, the construction of which must be carefully addressed.
Results
We carried out a series of 'self-self' hybridizations in which aliquots of the same RNA sample were labeled separately with Cy3 and Cy5 fluorescent dyes and co-hybridized to the same microarray. From this, we can analyze the intensity-dependent behavior of microarray data, define a statistically significant measure of differential expression that exploits the structure of the fluorescent signals, and measure the inherent reproducibility of the technique. We also devised a simple procedure for identifying and eliminating low-quality data for replicates within and between slides. We examine the properties required of a universal reference RNA sample and show how pooling a small number of samples with a diverse representation of expressed genes can outperform more complex mixtures as a reference sample.
Conclusion
Analysis of cell-line samples can identify systematic structure in measured gene-expression levels. A general procedure for analyzing cDNA microarray data is proposed and validated. We show that pooled reference samples should be based not only on the expression of individual genes in each cell line but also on the expression levels of genes within cell lines. |