Table 5 |
||||||
|
Order and orientation errors in the WGS assemblies compared to Release 3 |
||||||
|
WGS1 |
WGS2 |
WGS3 |
||||
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Number of segments |
Number of base-pairs |
Number of segments |
Number of base-pairs |
Number of segments |
Number of base-pairs |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Aligned segments |
2,125 |
113.30 Mb |
2,270 |
114.41 Mb |
1,087 |
114.99 Mb |
|
Local errors* |
9 |
68.33 kb |
7 |
9.80 kb |
3 |
5.64 kb |
|
Interleaving failures† |
17 |
39.42 kb |
28 |
137.75 kb |
33 |
139.42 kb |
|
Repeat errors‡ |
25 |
42.52 kb |
1 |
0.66 kb |
1 |
0.98 kb |
|
Gross misassemblies§ |
3 |
10.69 kb |
0 |
0 |
||
|
|
||||||
|
*Local errors include inversions and transpositions within a contig or that cause the order of contigs to be incorrect within a scaffold. †Interleaving failures are cases where it has not been recognized that two scaffolds overlap because the end contig in one scaffold lies in a gap in the adjacent scaffold. ‡Repeat errors are incorrect assemblies of transposable elements (see text for description). §Gross misassemblies are cases in which scaffolds themselves are out of order. |
||||||
|
Celniker et al. Genome Biology 2002 3:research0079.1 doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0079 |
||||||