Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from Genome Biology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research

Computational analysis of core promoters in the Drosophila genome

Uwe Ohler14*, Guo-chun Liao1, Heinrich Niemann3 and Gerald M Rubin12

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA

2 Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720-3200, USA

3 Computer Science 5, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Martensstrasse 3, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany

4 Current address: Department of Biology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Ave 68-223, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Genome Biology 2002, 3:research0087-0087.12  doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-12-research0087


This article is part of a series of refereed research articles from Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project, FlyBase and colleagues, describing Release 3 of the Drosophila genome, which are freely available at http://genomebiology.com/drosophila/.

Published: 20 December 2002

Abstract

Background

The core promoter, a region of about 100 base-pairs flanking the transcription start site (TSS), serves as the recognition site for the basal transcription apparatus. Drosophila TSSs have generally been mapped by individual experiments; the low number of accurately mapped TSSs has limited analysis of promoter sequence motifs and the training of computational prediction tools.

Results

We identified TSS candidates for about 2,000 Drosophila genes by aligning 5' expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from cap-trapped cDNA libraries to the genome, while applying stringent criteria concerning coverage and 5'-end distribution. Examination of the sequences flanking these TSSs revealed the presence of well-known core promoter motifs such as the TATA box, the initiator and the downstream promoter element (DPE). We also define, and assess the distribution of, several new motifs prevalent in core promoters, including what appears to be a variant DPE motif. Among the prevalent motifs is the DNA-replication-related element DRE, recently shown to be part of the recognition site for the TBP-related factor TRF2. Our TSS set was then used to retrain the computational promoter predictor McPromoter, allowing us to improve the recognition performance to over 50% sensitivity and 40% specificity. We compare these computational results to promoter prediction in vertebrates.

Conclusions

There are relatively few recognizable binding sites for previously known general transcription factors in Drosophila core promoters. However, we identified several new motifs enriched in promoter regions. We were also able to significantly improve the performance of computational TSS prediction in Drosophila.