Table 2
|
The actual and estimated FP's and FN's for the simulated data in the Results section. Often FP is quite well estimated, while the estimate FN^ seems to have a bias, but nevertheless captures the changes that takes place. |
||||
| normal |
||||
|
|
||||
| significance level |
||||
| p0 |
parameter |
0.02 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
|
|
||||
| 0.95 |
FP |
213 |
492 |
970 |
 |
192 |
480 |
960 |
|
| FN |
291 |
216 |
161 |
|
 |
205 |
139 |
86 |
|
| 0.9 |
FP |
173 |
447 |
920 |
|
182 |
455 |
910 |
|
| FN |
611 |
442 |
334 |
|
|
552 |
382 |
256 |
|
| lognormal |
||||
|
|
||||
| 0.95 |
FP |
191 |
492 |
940 |
|
192 |
480 |
960 |
|
| FN |
253 |
181 |
133 |
|
|
267 |
183 |
139 |
|
| 0.9 |
FP |
144 |
415 |
834 |
|
182 |
457 |
914 |
|
| FN |
529 |
366 |
256 |
|
|
456 |
296 |
224 |
|
Broberg Genome Biology 2002 3:preprint0007.1 doi:10.1186/gb-2002-3-9-preprint0007 |
||||