|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 5.
Examination of tag levels and fold-change in each of the SAGE library comparisons
considered in Figure 4. The data is plotted in a log scale in rotated coordinates, where log2(xy) serves to indicate tag levels in the two libraries (where x = tag levels in SAGE library A, and y = tag levels in SAGE library B) and log2(y/x) serves to indicate fold changes in tag levels. Tags with a count of zero in either
library were omitted from the analysis. The dark lines indicate the two standard deviation
confidence limit calculated for the distribution of tags in Figure 5c (that is, same starting mRNA, different SAGE libraries) using a locally weighted
smoothing technique based on the standard deviations in the neighborhood of each point.
This is done to allow ready comparison of the observed tag differences between SAGE
libraries to the baseline level of variability expected from SAGE library construction.
(a) Sampling, ONL1 vs ONL2 (same library, different tags); (b) ditag, P2.5A vs P2.5B (same ditag ligation, different libraries); (c) mRNA, crx+/+A vs crx+/+B (same starting mRNA, different libraries). (d) 44-year-old vs 41-year-old, libraries from peripheral retina from different similar-aged
males; (e) 88-year-old vs 44-year-old, libraries from peripheral retina from individuals that
differ in age and sex; (f) littermates, P6.5A vs P6.5B (libraries made from retinas of three P6.5 C57B/6 mice
vs libraries made from retinas of three littermates); (g) environment, hypothalamus A vs hypothalamus B (libraries made from hypothalami of
3 8-week-old male C57B/6 mice housed in Boston, MA vs libraries made from hypothalami
of 20 8-week-old male C57B/6 mice housed in Melbourne, Australia); (h) retina vs hypothalamus, libraries from adult male C57B/6 mouse retina vs adult male
C57B/6 mouse hypothalamus; (i) retina vs 3T3 cells, libraries from adult male C57B/6 mouse retina vs mouse 3T3 fibroblast
cell line. See Table 1 and Materials and methods for more information about these SAGE libraries.
Blackshaw et al. Genome Biology 2003 4:R17 doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-3-r17 |