|
Efficiency of each step of screening Meloidogyne datasets for HGT candidates |
||||
| Name |
Original |
First screen |
Second screen |
Final candidates |
|
|
||||
| WMi |
1,799 |
16 (0.889%) |
12 (0.667%) |
12 (0.667%) |
| WMj |
3,119 |
11 (0.353%) |
7 (0.224%) |
7 (0.224%) |
| NMi |
12,841 |
99 (0.771%) |
27 (0.210%) |
5 (0.038%) |
| NMj |
5,630 |
54 (0.959%) |
16 (0.284%) |
6 (0.107%) |
| NMh |
6,514 |
4 (0.061%) |
0 (0.00%) |
0 (0.00%) |
|
Clustered ESTs (W) were from the Parasitic Nematode Sequencing Project at Washington University. Raw ESTs (N) were extracted from NCBI's GenBank. Mi, Meloidogyne incognita; Mj, M. javanica; Mh, M. hapla. 'Original number' gives the size of the initial dataset. For both screens, matches were declared when e-values were less than 1.0e-10. The percentage of the original number of sequences remaining after each screen is listed in parentheses. 'Final candidates' reflects total number of candidates after removal of redundancy. | ||||
Scholl et al. Genome Biology 2003 4:R39 doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-6-r39 |
||||