Table 3

Ranking based on the leukemia data [16]

Gene
t-test rank
SAM rank
samroc rank
Bayes rank

M55150
7,052
7,048
6,749.5
5,711
M21551
4,918
4,995
6,203
6,686
M81933
6,204
6,161
5,747
5,094
U63289
5,719
5,731
6697
6,915
M11147
6,878
6,954
7086
7,087
U41767
6,391
6,557
5,719
4,726
M16038
1,152
1,212
2,232
4,044
U50136
7,055
7,047
7,089
7,026
M13485
6,257
6,237
6,849
6,994
D49950
6,286
6,500
6,671
6,488
M80254
4,303
4,374
5,274
5,807
U51336
6,466
6,554
6,406
5,832
X95735
7,047
7,054
7,112
7,115
M62762
7,094
7,118
6,939
5,820
L08177
7,066
7,119
7,126
7,120
Z30644
1,655
1,720
2,458
3,495
U12471
6,905
6,800
6,096
5,000
M21904
6,136
6,118
6,477
6,428
U05681
5,814
5,725
5,915
5,702
U77604
6,825
7,017
7,105
7,113
D50310
4,507
4,744
5,967
6,534
Z48501
7,008
7,030
7,067
6,941
M81758
6,303
6,331
6,918
7,033
U82759
6,266
6,386
6,106
5,437
M95678
6,836
6,899
7,006
6,908
X74262
7,061
7,085
7,119
7,121
M91432
6,797
6,959
7,050
6,997
HG1612-HT1612
6,733
6,668
6,504
5,883
M31211
6,780
6,813
5,610
4,375
X59417
6,382
6,707
7,008
7,061
Z69881
7,100
7,124
6,860
5,476
U22376
7,068
7,100
7,106
7,007
L07758
7,091
7,114
7,127
7,128
L47738
6,997
6,974
6,944
6,520
U32944
5,485
5,908
6,751
6,953
U26266
6,735
6,966
7,091
7,101
M92287
6,812
6,969
7,070
7,054
U05259
6,987
7,003
7,074
7,029
M65214
6,947
7,058
7,115
7,119
L13278
7,086
7,113
7,120
7,103
M31523
6,963
7,035
6,968
6,454
M77142
6,789
6,929
7,075
7,090
U09087
6,909
6,987
7,021
6,809
D38073
6,698
6,738
6,916
6,815
U38846
6,593
6,827
7,062
7,099
J05243
7,129
7,128
7,096
6,539
D26156
6,962
7,012
7,046
6,874
X15414
6,608
6,790
6,117
5,023
S50223
6809
6,861
6,629
5,886
X74801
6,726
6,895
7,032
6,996
Average
6,367.8
6,443.88
6,550.51
6,371.36

Results for the leukemia data using only the first four samples from ALL and AML. The higher the average rank the better the method has been at identifying the probe sets that are changed.

Broberg Genome Biology 2003 4:R41   doi:10.1186/gb-2003-4-6-r41