Table 1

Validation of prediction method on experimentally verified miRNA targets

MiRNA
Organism
Target gene (3' UTR)
Number of experimental sites
Number of predicted sites
Rank
Number of predicted sites with conservation
Matches experimental to predicted
Matches experimental to predicted (%)

lin-4
cel/cbr
lin-14 (Abnormal cell-lineage protein 14)
7
1

0
0
0%
lin-4
cel/cbr
lin-28
1
1
4/1,014
1
1
100%
lin-4
cel/cbr
lin-41a lin41b
1
1
5/1,014
N/A
1
100%
let-7
cel/cbr
lin-14 (Abnormal cell-lineage protein 14)
2
6
9/1,014
2
2
100%
let-7
cel/cbr
lin-28
1
1
12/1,014
1
1
100%
let-7
cel/cbr
lin-41a lin41b
2
6
2/1,014
N/A
2
100%
let-7
cel/cbr
daf-12
3
10
7/1,014
1
1
33%
let-7
cel/cbr
hbl-1 (hunchback-related protein)
8
14
1/1,014
8
5
63%
bantam
dme/dps
hid (Head involution defective (wrinkled))
2
2
1/11,318
2
2
100%
miR-13
dme/dps
CG10222
1
1
4/11,318
1
1
100%

Using intermediate thresholds (S: 80; ΔG: -14 kcal/mol), for each known miRNA and target gene pair (in either C. elegans or D. melanogaster), we list the number of known experimental target sites, the number of sites detected here, both raw and conserved in C. briggsae or D. pseudoobscura; and, the number and percentage of known sites that correspond to computationally detected conserved sites, with larger values indicating more successful (retrospective) prediction († and 'N/A' indicate that no 3' UTR was available to scan against in C. briggsae, hence no conservation analysis was possible, results assume conservation). cel/cbr: C. elegans/C. briggsae; dme/dps: D. melanogaster/D. pseudoobscura.

Enright et al. Genome Biology 2003 5:R1   doi:10.1186/gb-2003-5-1-r1

Open Data