Table 2 |
|||
|
Sequence motifs enriched in skipped exons (SEs) and alternative 5' splice site exons (A5Es) |
|||
|
AS type /tissue (motif name) |
Oligonucleotides |
Occurrences |
Consensus (% of exons containing) |
|
|
|||
|
SE/brain (BR1) |
CUCCUG |
169 |
CUCC (45.3) |
|
CUCCU |
323 |
||
|
CUCCC |
264 |
||
|
CUCC |
945 |
||
|
CCUCCC |
137 |
CCUC (41.0) |
|
|
CCUCC |
363 |
||
|
CCUC |
1021 |
||
|
GCCUCC |
136 |
||
|
GCCUC |
375 |
||
|
GCCUCA |
122 |
||
|
GGCCUC |
118 |
||
|
UGCCUC |
108 |
||
|
SE/brain (BR2) |
GGGUU |
97 |
GGGU (25.6) |
|
GGGU |
411 |
||
|
AGGGU |
116 |
||
|
SE/brain (BR3) |
UGGGA |
324 |
UGGG (47.2) |
|
UGGG |
948 |
||
|
CUGGG |
426 |
||
|
CCUGGG |
171 |
||
|
SE/brain (BR4) |
GGGAUU |
58 |
GGGA (45.5) |
|
GGGAU |
176 |
||
|
GGGA |
840 |
||
|
SE/brain (BR5) |
CUCA |
925 |
CUCA (46.5) |
|
CUCAC |
206 |
||
|
GCCUCA |
122 |
||
|
GGCUCA |
102 |
||
|
GCUCAC |
79 |
||
|
CUCAGC |
126 |
||
|
SE/brain (BR6) |
UAGC |
269 |
UAGC (18.0) |
|
UAGCU |
106 |
||
|
GUAGC |
96 |
||
|
GUAGCU |
51 |
||
|
AGUAGC |
47 |
||
|
UAGCUG |
54 |
||
|
SE/brain (BR7) |
UAGG |
186 |
UAGG (13.8) |
|
UUAGG |
63 |
||
|
UUAGGG |
24 |
||
|
SE/testis (TE1) |
UAGG |
99 |
UAGG (16.6) |
|
UUAGG |
33 |
||
|
Core A5E/liver (LI1) |
AAAC |
42 |
AAAC (53.3) |
|
AAAAC |
18 |
||
|
Core A5E/liver (LI2) |
UAAA |
29 |
UAAA (40.0) |
|
UAAACC |
5 |
||
|
|
|||
|
Sequence motifs of length four to six bases that are significantly over-represented (p < 0.002) in SEs relative to constitutively spliced exons from brain- or testis-derived ESTs are shown, followed by the number of occurrences in SEs in these tissues. Sequence motifs are grouped/aligned by similarity, and shared tetramers are shown in bold and listed in the last column, followed by the fraction of SEs that contain the given tetramer. Sequence motifs significantly over-represented (p < 0.01) in the core of A5Es from human liver-derived ESTs are shown at the bottom, followed by the number of A5E occurrences and the fraction of A5Es that contain the given tetramer. Statistical significance was evaluated as described in Materials and methods. |
|||
|
Yeo et al. Genome Biology 2004 5:R74 doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r74 |
|||