Table 4 |
||||
|
Association of retroelements with heterochromatin |
||||
| Hypotheses |
Test |
Group(s) tested |
p-values |
Accept? |
|
|
||||
| All families share a similar probability of being in or outside heterochromatin |
MRPP, 10,000 random permutations |
MV(FSR), PV(FSR), NL(R) |
0.0000 |
No |
| MV(FSR), PV(FSR) |
0.0000 |
No |
||
| MV(FSR), NL(R) |
0.0000 |
No |
||
| PV(FSR), NL(R) |
0.0000 |
No |
||
| Metaviridae sublineages have similar heterochromatic distributions |
MRPP, 10,000 random permutations |
MV Athila, Metavirus, Tat |
0.0011 |
No |
| MV Athila, Metavirus |
0.0016 |
No |
||
| MV Athila, Tat |
0.5211 |
Yes |
||
| MV Metavirus, Tat |
0.0105 |
No |
||
| Element subtypes have similar heterochromatic distributions |
MRPP, 1,000 random permutations |
MV(SR), PV(SR), NL(R) |
0.0000 |
No |
| MV(FR), PV(FR), NL(R) |
0.3960 |
Yes |
||
| MV(FS), PV(FS) |
0.0000 |
No |
||
| Pseudoviridae subtypes have similar heterochromatic distributions |
Pearson's chi-square |
PV(FSR) |
0.0002 |
No |
| PV(FS) |
0.0001 |
No |
||
| PV(FR) |
0.0073 |
No |
||
| PV(SR) |
0.9419 |
Yes |
||
| Metaviridae subtypes have similar heterochromatic distributions |
Pearson's chi-square |
MV(FSR) |
0.0001 |
No |
| MV(FS) |
0.0002 |
No |
||
| MV(FR) |
0.5146 |
Yes |
||
| MV(SR) |
0.0159 |
No |
||
|
|
||||
|
MV, Metaviridae; PV, Pseudoviridae; NL, non-LTR retrotransposon; R, RT-only; S, solo LTR; F, full-length element. p-values < 0.05 are displayed in bold text. |
||||
|
Peterson-Burch et al. Genome Biology 2004 5:R78 doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r78 |
||||
