Genome Biology Volume 5 Issue 5 |
Viewing options:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
As a service to the research community, Genome Biology used to publish non-peer-reviewed articles in a 'preprint' depository to which
any research can be submitted and which all individuals can access free of charge.From January 2006 Genome Biology
no longer publishes new articles in this section. Any article could be submitted by authors, who have sole responsibility for the article's content.
The only screening process is to ensure relevance of the preprint to Genome Biology's scope and to avoid abusive, libellous or indecent articles.
Articles in this section of the journal have not been peer-reviewed. Each preprint has a permanent URL, by which it can be cited.
Research submitted to the preprint depository may be simultaneously or subsequently submitted to Genome Biology or any other publication for peer review; the only requirement is an explicit citation of, and link to, the preprint in the article that is eventually published.
If possible, Genome Biology will provide a reciprocal link from the preprint depository to the published article.

Deposited research articleA new estimate of the proportion unchanged genes in a microarray
experimentPer Broberg  Biological Sciences, AstraZeneca R&D Lund, S-221 87 Lund, Sweden author email corresponding author email
Genome Biology 2004,
5:P10doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-5-p10 This was the first version of this article to be made available publicly.
Subject areas: Bioinformatics, Methods, Genome studies Abstract
Background
In the analysis of microarray data one generally produces a vector of p-values that for each gene give the likelihood of obtaining equally strong evidence of change by pure chance. The distribution of these p-values is a mixture of two components corresponding to the changed genes and the unchanged ones. The basic question 'What proportion of genes is changed' is a non-trivial one, with implications for the way that such experiments are analysed. An estimate not requiring any assumptions on the distributions is proposed and evaluated. The approach relies on the concept of a moment generating function.
Results
A simulation model of real microarray data was used to assess the proposed method. The method fared very well, and gave evidence of low bias and very low variance.
Conclusions
The approach opens up a new possibility of sharpening the inference concerning microarray experiments, including more stable estimates of the false discovery rate. |