Table 4 |
||||||
|
Percentage of correctly identified sites using different options in BioProspector |
||||||
|
L |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
crp |
Options |
400 |
500 |
600 |
700 |
800 |
|
|
||||||
|
5:6:5 |
47 |
53 |
65 |
41 |
0 |
|
|
4:6:4 |
29 |
41 |
24 |
29 |
0 |
|
|
6:6:6 |
41 |
53 |
0 |
0 |
6* |
|
|
5:(5-6):5 |
41 |
35 |
0 |
6* |
0 |
|
|
5:(6-7):5 |
47 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
5:(5-7):5 |
47 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
L |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
abf1 |
Options |
600 |
700 |
800 |
900 |
|
|
|
||||||
|
4:5:4 |
56 |
44 |
50 |
33 |
||
|
5:5:4 |
39 |
0 |
0 |
6* |
||
|
5:5:5 |
28 |
0 |
0 |
6* |
||
|
4:(4-5):4 |
78 |
56 |
0 |
0 |
||
|
4:(5-6):4 |
33 |
39 |
0 |
0 |
||
|
4:(4-6):4 |
50 |
44 |
0 |
0 |
||
|
L |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
rap1 |
Options |
1,400 |
1,500 |
1,600 |
1,700 |
1,800 |
|
|
||||||
|
W = 5 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
W = 6 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
W = 7 |
60 |
60 |
47 |
57 |
47 |
|
|
W = 8 |
73 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
L |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
reb1 |
Options |
500 |
600 |
700 |
||
|
|
||||||
|
W = 5 |
79 |
71 |
71 |
|||
|
W = 6 |
71 |
71 |
86 |
|||
|
W = 7 |
79 |
86 |
79 |
|||
|
W = 8 |
93 |
71 |
79 |
|||
|
|
||||||
|
The bimodal examples (crp, abf1) use three options: first block width, gap length and second block width. The values for these options are separated by colons in the table. For example, 5:6:5 corresponds to two blocks of five positions separated by a gap of six positions. The gap ranges are denoted by a dash. For the unimodal motifs (rap1, reb1), there is only one option for the block width, denoted by W. Entries labeled with an asterisk correspond to a trial in which the correct motif was not found, but one or two sites were correctly predicted by chance, with a spurious motif. |
||||||
|
Kechris et al. Genome Biology 2004 5:R50 doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-7-r50 |
||||||
