As a service to the research community, Genome Biology used to publish non-peer-reviewed articles in a 'preprint' depository to which any research can be submitted and which all individuals can access free of charge.From January 2006 Genome Biology no longer publishes new articles in this section. Any article could be submitted by authors, who have sole responsibility for the article's content. The only screening process is to ensure relevance of the preprint to Genome Biology's scope and to avoid abusive, libellous or indecent articles. Articles in this section of the journal have not been peer-reviewed. Each preprint has a permanent URL, by which it can be cited. Research submitted to the preprint depository may be simultaneously or subsequently submitted to Genome Biology or any other publication for peer review; the only requirement is an explicit citation of, and link to, the preprint in the article that is eventually published. If possible, Genome Biology will provide a reciprocal link from the preprint depository to the published article.

Deposited research article

The influence of RNA integrity, purity and cDNA labelling on glass slide cDNA microarray image quality

Dachuan Guo, Belinda Cutri and Daniel R Catchpoole

The Tumour Bank, The Oncology Research Unit, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia

author email corresponding author email

Genome Biology 2004, 5:P13doi:10.1186/gb-2004-5-8-p13

Published:	16 July 2004

This was the first version of this article to be made available publicly.

Subject areas: Genome studies, Methods

Abstract

Background

The accuracy of gene expression measurements generated using cDNA microarrays is dependent on the quality of the image generated following hybridization of fluorescently labelled cDNA. It is not known how this image is influenced by sample preparation factors which such as RNA quality, cDNA synthesis and labelling efficiency.

Results

In this study we used a simple metric based on the ratio of the total feature (F) and background (B) fluorescence, which correlates with the visual assessment of 60 microarray images, to determine the influence of sample preparation on image quality. Results indicate that RNA purity (A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀) and integrity (18S:28S ratio) do not strongly influence microarray image quality. cDNA having an nucleotide to dye ratio greater than 100 produced poor microarray images, however, cDNA labelled more efficiently was not a guarantee of a better image. The data also indicate that the array image quality is not improved by loading more cDNA into the hybridization mixture however poor image quality did result from a disproportionate amounts of Cy5 and Cy3 labelled cDNA.

Conclusion

This study provides insight into the source of variation in microarray image analysis introduced during sample preparation and will assist in the standardisation of cDNA glass slide microarray protocols.