|
| As a service to the research community, Genome Biology used to publish non-peer-reviewed articles in a 'preprint' depository to which any research can be submitted and which all individuals can access free of charge.From January 2006 Genome Biology no longer publishes new articles in this section. Any article could be submitted by authors, who have sole responsibility for the article's content. The only screening process is to ensure relevance of the preprint to Genome Biology's scope and to avoid abusive, libellous or indecent articles. Articles in this section of the journal have not been peer-reviewed. Each preprint has a permanent URL, by which it can be cited. Research submitted to the preprint depository may be simultaneously or subsequently submitted to Genome Biology or any other publication for peer review; the only requirement is an explicit citation of, and link to, the preprint in the article that is eventually published. If possible, Genome Biology will provide a reciprocal link from the preprint depository to the published article.![]() Deposited research article Using Topology of the Metabolic Network to Predict Viability of Mutant Strains1Biophysics Program, Harvard University, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 16-361, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA. 2Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences & Technology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, 16-343, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Genome Biology 2005, 6:P15doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-13-p15 This was the first version of this article to be made available publicly. Subject areas: Bioinformatics, Microbiology and parasitology, Biochemistry and structural biology The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://genomebiology.com/2005/6/13/P15
© 2005 BioMed Central Ltd AbstractBackgroundUnderstanding the relationships between the structure (topology) and function of biological networks is a central question of systems biology. The idea that topology is a major determinant of systems function has become an attractive and highly-disputed hypothesis. While the structural analysis of interaction networks demonstrates a correlation between the topological properties of a node (protein, gene) in the network and its functional essentiality, the analysis of metabolic networks fails to find such correlations. In contrast, approaches utilizing both the topology and biochemical parameters of metabolic networks, e.g. flux balance analysis (FBA), are more successful in predicting phenotypes of knock-out strains. ResultsWe reconcile these seemingly conflicting results by showing that the topology of E. coli's metabolic network is, in fact, sufficient to predict the viability of knock-out strains with accuracy comparable to FBA on a large, unbiased dataset of mutants. This surprising result is obtained by introducing a novel topology-based measure of network transport: synthetic accessibility. We also show that other popular topology-based characteristics like node degree, graph diameter, and node usage (betweenness) fail to predict the viability of mutant strains. The success of synthetic accessibility demonstrates its ability to capture the essential properties of the metabolic network, such as the branching of chemical reactions and the directed transport of material from inputs to outputs. ConclusionsOur results (1) strongly support a link between the topology and function of biological networks; (2) in agreement with recent genetic studies, emphasize the minimal role of flux re-routing in providing robustness of mutant strains. Additional data filesAdditional data files 1, 2 and 3. Additional data file 1. Additional data file 1 Format: XLS Size: 29KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Excel Viewer Additional data file 2. Additional data file 2 Format: XLS Size: 102KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Excel Viewer Additional data file 3. Additional data file 3 Format: XLS Size: 50KB Download file This file can be viewed with: Microsoft Excel Viewer Have something to say? Post a comment on this article! |


on Google Scholar







author email
corresponding author email