Table 2 |
||||||||
|
Known regulatory elements obtained when applying FastCompare to C. elegans and C. briggsae |
||||||||
|
Sequence |
Rank |
DATG |
WATG |
Orientation |
U/C |
Experiment |
TRANSFAC |
Comments |
|
|
||||||||
|
TGATAAG |
5 |
746 |
[0;600] |
← (p < 10-6) |
1.67 |
103(56/47) |
GATA-1, GATA-2 |
Known GATA factor |
|
AATCGAT |
6 |
865.5 |
[0;1900] |
- |
1.00 |
14(2/12) |
CDP, Clox |
Similar to DRE, embryonic development (p < 10-8) |
|
TGACTCAT |
8 |
708 |
- |
→ (p < 10-4) |
1.40 |
- |
AP-1, GCN4, NF-E2 |
Known AP-1 site |
|
GTGTTTGC |
9 |
383.5 |
[0;800] |
- |
2.44 |
- |
- |
Known forkhead-related activator 4 |
|
CACGTGG |
16 |
935 |
- |
- |
0.73 |
12(9/3) |
Myc/Max, PHO4, USF |
Known Myc-Max site in Drosophila |
|
AAGGTCA |
22 |
882 |
[0;1400] |
- |
1.52 |
35(16/19) |
ER, HNF-4 |
Known HRE |
|
TGACGTC |
32 |
858 |
[0;1700] |
- |
0.94 |
1(1/0) |
CREB, ATF |
Known CREB site |
|
TGTCATCA |
42 |
879 |
- |
- |
0.80 |
- |
Skn-1 |
Known SKN-1 site |
|
CAGCTGG |
56 |
1093 |
[100;2000] |
- |
0.67 |
5(2/3) |
AP-4, HEN-1 |
Known AP-4 and MyoD/CeMyoD site |
|
AGAGAGA |
57 |
893 |
- |
→ (p < 10-90) |
1.43 |
4(2/2) |
- |
Known GAGA-factor site |
|
GTAAACA |
79 |
818 |
[0;400] |
- |
2.69 |
28(28/0) |
Freac, SRY |
Known DAF-16 site |
|
CCCGCCC |
88 |
535 |
[0;1400] |
- |
2.48 |
1(0/1) |
Sp1, GC box |
Known Sp1 site |
|
ATCAATCA |
100 |
911 |
- |
- |
0.93 |
1(1/0) |
Pbx-1 |
Known Pbx-1 site |
|
CAGGTGA |
111 |
845 |
[0;200] |
- |
2.25 |
- |
Lmo2, RAV1 |
Known Snail site in Drosophila |
|
TTCGCGC |
148 |
651.5 |
[0;1200] |
- |
1.7 |
16(7/9) |
E2F |
Known E2F site, embryonic development (p < 10-6) |
|
|
||||||||
|
For each known regulatory element, we show the best k-mer, its rank within the set of 437 highest scoring k-mers, the median distance to ATG (for occurrences upstream of genes within the conserved set), the optimal window, the orientation bias, the corrected ratio of upstream/coding bias, the total (up-regulated/down-regulated) number of microarray conditions in which the k-mer was found (see Materials and methods), TRANSFAC matches, and the best GO enrichment. |
||||||||
|
Elemento and Tavazoie Genome Biology 2005 6:R18 doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-2-r18 |
||||||||