Genome Biology

official impact factor 6.89

Open Access Highly Access Research

Promoter features related to tissue specificity as measured by Shannon entropy

Jonathan Schug1*, Winfried-Paul Schuller2, Claudia Kappen2, J Michael Salbaum2, Maja Bucan3 and Christian J Stoeckert1

Author Affiliations

1 Center for Bioinformatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

2 Department of Genetics, Cell Biology and Anatomy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE 68198, USA

3 Department of Genetics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

For all author emails, please log on.

Genome Biology 2005, 6:R33 doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-4-r33

Published: 29 March 2005

Abstract

Background

The regulatory mechanisms underlying tissue specificity are a crucial part of the development and maintenance of multicellular organisms. A genome-wide analysis of promoters in the context of gene-expression patterns in tissue surveys provides a means of identifying the general principles for these mechanisms.

Results

We introduce a definition of tissue specificity based on Shannon entropy to rank human genes according to their overall tissue specificity and by their specificity to particular tissues. We apply our definition to microarray-based and expressed sequence tag (EST)-based expression data for human genes and use similar data for mouse genes to validate our results. We show that most genes show statistically significant tissue-dependent variations in expression level. We find that the most tissue-specific genes typically have a TATA box, no CpG island, and often code for extracellular proteins. As expected, CpG islands are found in most of the least tissue-specific genes, which often code for proteins located in the nucleus or mitochondrion. The class of genes with no CpG island or TATA box are the most common mid-specificity genes and commonly code for proteins located in a membrane. Sp1 was found to be a weak indicator of less-specific expression. YY1 binding sites, either as initiators or as downstream sites, were strongly associated with the least-specific genes.

Conclusions

We have begun to understand the components of promoters that distinguish tissue-specific from ubiquitous genes, to identify associations that can predict the broad class of gene expression from sequence data alone.