Table 2 |
|||||
|
A comparison of the contributions of each dataset to the composite human protein interaction map, with network properties of each of the datasets |
|||||
|
Dataset |
Version |
Number of interactions |
Number of proteins |
Clustering <C> |
Connectivity <#interactions/protein> |
|
|
|||||
|
Reactome |
08/03/04 |
9,987 |
619 |
0.74 |
15.4 |
|
BIND |
08/03/04 |
1,536 |
1,212 |
0.1 |
1.3 |
|
HPRD |
04/12/04 |
6,054 |
2,747 |
0.09 |
2.2 |
|
Orthology inferred (core) |
03/31/04 |
9,283 |
3,469 |
0.13 |
2.7 |
|
Co-citation |
This paper |
6,580 |
3,737 |
0.3 |
1.8 |
|
Total |
This paper |
31,609 |
7,748 |
0.24 |
4.1 |
|
|
|||||
|
An analysis of network features (clustering coefficient [38] and degree of connectivity) of each of the datasets indicates low degree (<k>) for all except Reactome, which is by far the most densely sampled protein interaction dataset. The final combined network is modular in structure and shows extensive, non-random clustering of proteins as compared to randomly generated networks with equal numbers of proteins and interactions (<C> = 9 × 10-3 ± -3 × 10-5; average of 10 trials). |
|||||
|
Ramani et al. Genome Biology 2005 6:R40 doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-5-r40 |
|||||