Table 1 |
|||||
|
Classification and array detection of rice chromosome 10 gene models |
|||||
|
Annotation |
Nonredundant protein-coding gene model |
TE |
|||
|
|
|||||
|
Type |
Annotated |
Detected |
Percentage |
||
|
BGI indica |
CG |
821 |
784 |
95.5% |
|
|
EG |
328 |
290 |
88.4% |
||
|
UG |
1,660 |
1,354 |
81.6% |
||
|
Total |
2,809 |
2,428 |
86.4% |
574 |
|
|
BGI japonica |
CG |
943 |
879 |
93.2% |
|
|
EG |
272 |
238 |
87.5% |
||
|
UG |
1,549 |
1,202 |
77.6% |
||
|
Total |
2,764 |
2,319 |
83.9% |
851 |
|
|
TIGR japonica |
CG |
935 |
871 |
93.2% |
|
|
EG |
321 |
291 |
90.7% |
||
|
UG |
1,763 |
1,310 |
74.3% |
||
|
Total |
3,019 |
2,472 |
81.9% |
829 |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Rice chromosome 10 protein-coding gene models were divided into TE and nonredundant models based on available annotations. Because of their repetitiveness, expression of TE models was not assessed. The nonredundant models were further divided into CG, EG and UG models based on their alignment to rice full-length cDNAs and ESTs and their expression assessed by tiling microarray analysis. |
|||||
|
Li et al. Genome Biology 2005 6:R52 doi:10.1186/gb-2005-6-6-r52 |
|||||