Table 1 |
||||
|
Statistical significance of associations with CpG islands, CAGE tag shape classes, promoter expression, and imprinting candidates |
||||
|
Positional bias |
Regional bias |
Other |
||
|
|
||||
|
CpG islands |
CpG |
4.11 × 10-25* |
1.65 × 10-56* |
1.00 |
|
Not CpG |
1.00 |
1.00 |
2.22 × 10-113* |
|
|
CAGE tag shape class |
Single dominant peak |
1.00 |
1.00 |
2.13 × 10-182* |
|
Broad distribution with a dominant peak |
1.92 × 10-02 |
3.72 × 10-01 |
9.89 × 10-01 |
|
|
Multimodal Distribution |
2.37 × 10-12* |
1.49 × 10-02 |
1.00 |
|
|
General broad Distribution |
6.70 × 10-01 |
3.19 × 10-79* |
1.00 |
|
|
Imprinting candidates |
Maternal imprinting candidates |
7.94 × 10-01 |
1.86 × 10-04* |
9.97 × 10-01 |
|
Paternal imprinting candidates |
6.65 × 10-04* |
2.77 × 10-01 |
1.00 |
|
|
Not candidates |
9.69 × 10-01 |
9.99 × 10-01 |
7.08 × 10-06* |
|
|
|
||||
|
Shown are the levels of statistical significance (P values) of associations with CpG islands, CAGE tag shape classes, promoter expression, and imprinting candidates, where the Fisher's exact test is used for the null hypothesis that the two examined sets do not have any positive associations. *Statistically significant findings. CAGE, cap analysis of gene expression. |
||||
|
Kawaji et al. Genome Biology 2006 7:R118 doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-12-r118 |
||||