Table 1 |
|||||
|
PS2 enhancer functional divergence correlates with sequence constraint |
|||||
|
Sequence analysis |
Functional test |
||||
|
|
|||||
|
Species compared |
Conservation P value |
Species assayed |
Relative enhancer strength |
||
|
|
|
||||
|
PS1 |
PS2 |
PS1 |
PS2 |
||
|
|
|||||
|
Human/5 primates |
4.8 × 10-5 |
10-5 |
Human |
0.9 |
5.1 |
|
Human/lemur |
~1 |
0.76 |
Lemur |
ND |
2.6 |
|
Human/mouse |
~1 |
~0.99 |
Mouse |
ND |
1.5 |
|
Human/dog |
0.28 |
0.45 |
Dog |
ND |
2.6 |
|
|
|||||
|
Conservation P values are calculated using Gumby [12] under the null hypothesis of evolution at the neutral (background) rate. Low P values indicate that the null model of neutrality should be rejected, with the lowest P values identify the most significantly conserved sequences. The sequences analyzed for human-mammal conservation or enhancer activity correspond to the Gumby predicted conserved sequence and approximately 200 base pairs of flanking sequence on either side (see Materials and methods). Enhancer strength is shown as fold increase over promoter alone in luciferase assays in 293T cells. ND, not done. |
|||||
|
Wang et al. Genome Biology 2006 7:R68 doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-8-r68 |
|||||