Table 5 |
||||||||||
|
Clinical and genetic data of carefully selected neuroblastoma samples that were included in this study |
||||||||||
|
Sample number |
Lab number |
% Tumor cells |
Stage |
MYCN amp |
Ploidy |
Adrenal localisation |
Age |
Dead/alive |
Overall survival (months) |
Type |
|
|
||||||||||
|
NB1 |
01T15 |
80 |
4S |
No |
Tri |
Yes |
< 1 year |
Alive |
61.4 |
Favorable |
|
NB2 |
98T33 |
95 |
1 |
No |
Tri |
Yes |
< 1 year |
Alive |
76.9 |
Favorable |
|
NB3 |
96T82 |
90 |
1 |
No |
Tri |
Yes |
< 1 year |
Alive |
115.5 |
Favorable |
|
NB4 |
99T129 |
90 |
1 |
No |
Tri |
Yes |
< 1 year |
Alive |
71.7 |
Favorable |
|
NB5 |
01T28 |
90 |
4 |
Yes |
Di |
Yes |
> 1 year |
Dead |
5.6 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB6 |
03T304 |
100 |
3a |
No |
Di |
Abdominal |
> 1 year |
Alive |
12.0 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB7 |
03T236 |
90 |
4 |
No |
ND |
Yes |
> 5 year |
Dead |
19.4 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB8 |
00T54 |
70 |
1 |
No |
Tri |
Yes |
< 1 year |
Alive |
62.6 |
Favorable |
|
NB9 |
00T35 |
> 95 |
4 |
Yes |
Di |
Yes |
< 1 year |
Dead |
13.7 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB10 |
99T125 |
80 |
3 |
No |
Di |
Yes |
> 5 year |
Alive |
79.3 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB11 |
92W145 |
70 |
4 |
No |
ND |
ND |
> 5 year |
Dead |
19.5 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB12 |
02T192 |
100 |
4 |
Yes |
Di |
Abdominal |
> 5 year |
Dead |
16.2 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB13 |
D031 |
> 95 |
4 |
No |
Di |
Abdominal |
> 1 year |
Dead |
64.8 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB14 |
E002 |
> 80 |
4 |
No |
ND |
Abdominal |
> 1 year |
Alive |
65.7 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB15 |
E037 |
> 80 |
4 |
No |
ND |
Abdominal |
> 1 year |
Alive |
45.3 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB16 |
E044 |
> 80 |
4 |
No |
ND |
Yes |
< 1 year |
Alive |
37.0 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB17 |
E121 |
> 80 |
4 |
Yes |
ND |
Abdominal |
> 1 year |
Dead |
78.4 |
Unfavorable |
|
NB18 |
04T121 |
60 |
3 |
Yes |
Di |
Yes |
> 1 year |
Dead |
6 |
Unfavorable |
|
|
||||||||||
|
Based on stage, MYCN amplification, ploidy, and age at diagnosis, samples were subdivided into favorable or unfavorable type. aNeuroblastoma or ganglioneuroblastoma. ND, not determined or unknown. |
||||||||||
|
De Preter et al. Genome Biology 2006 7:R84 doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-9-r84 |
||||||||||