This article is part of the supplement: EGASP '05: ENCODE Genome Annotation Assessment Project
EGASP: the human ENCODE Genome Annotation Assessment Project
-
* Corresponding authors: Roderic Guigó rguigo@imim.es - Martin G Reese mreese@omicia.com
- Equal contributors
Genome Biology 2006, 7(Suppl 1):S2 doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s2
Accesses
- Last 30 days: 108 accesses
- Last year: 1540 accesses
- All time: 9775 accesses
Cited by
BioMed Central: 11 citations
|
Synergistic use of plant-prokaryote comparative genomics for functional annotations Svetlana Gerdes, Basma El Yacoubi, Marc Bailly, Ian K Blaby, Crysten E Blaby-Haas, Linda Jeanguenin, Aurora Lara-Núñez, Anne Pribat, Jeffrey C Waller, Andreas Wilke, Ross Overbeek, Andrew D Hanson, Valérie de Crécy-Lagard BMC Genomics 2011, 12(Suppl 1):S2 (15 June 2011) |
|
A novel and well-defined benchmarking method for second generation read mapping Manuel Holtgrewe, Anne-Katrin Emde, David Weese, Knut Reinert BMC Bioinformatics 2011, 12:210 (26 May 2011) |
|
A standard variation file format for human genome sequences Martin G Reese, Barry Moore, Colin Batchelor, Fidel Salas, Fiona Cunningham, Gabor T Marth, Lincoln Stein, Paul Flicek, Mark Yandell, Karen Eilbeck Genome Biology 2010, 11:R88 (26 August 2010) The genome variation format (GVF) and the 10Gen dataset provide a resource for the standardization of variant files and data analysis.
|
|
Quantitative measures for the management and comparison of annotated genomes Karen Eilbeck, Barry Moore, Carson Holt, Mark Yandell BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:67 (23 February 2009) |
|
Annotating genomes with massive-scale RNA sequencing France Denoeud, Jean-Marc Aury, Corinne Da Silva, Benjamin Noel, Odile Rogier, Massimo Delledonne, Michele Morgante, Giorgio Valle, Patrick Wincker, Claude Scarpelli, Olivier Jaillon, François Artiguenave Genome Biology 2008, 9:R175 (16 December 2008) A method for de novo genome annotation using high-throughput cDNA sequencing data. |
|
Identification and correction of abnormal, incomplete and mispredicted proteins in public databases Alinda Nagy, Hédi Hegyi, Krisztina Farkas, Hedvig Tordai, Evelin Kozma, László Bányai, László Patthy BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:353 (27 August 2008) The MisPred tool improves gene predictions within public databases by using five distinct approaches to detect incomplete or incorrect sequences, such as missing signal peptides or problems with domain integrity.
|
|
CONTRAST: a discriminative, phylogeny-free approach to multiple informant de novo gene prediction Samuel S Gross, Chuong B Do, Marina Sirota, Serafim Batzoglou Genome Biology 2007, 8:R269 (20 December 2007) CONTRAST is a gene predictor that directly incorporates information from multiple alignments and uses discriminative machine learning techniques to give large improvements in prediction over previous methods. |
|
Gene prediction: compare and CONTRAST Paul Flicek Genome Biology 2007, 8:233 (20 December 2007) The new gene-prediction program CONTRAST offers significant advances in accuracy over previous methods.
|
|
Functional constraint and small insertions and deletions in the ENCODE regions of the human genome Taane G Clark, Toby Andrew, Gregory M Cooper, Elliott H Margulies, James C Mullikin, David J Balding Genome Biology 2007, 8:R180 (4 September 2007) Indel rates were observed to be reduced approximately twenty-fold in exonic ENCODE regions, five-fold in sequence that exhibits high evolutionary constraint in mammals and up to two-fold in some classes of regulatory elements. |
|
An annotation infrastructure for the analysis and interpretation of Affymetrix exon array data Michał J Okoniewski, Tim Yates, Siân Dibben, Crispin J Miller Genome Biology 2007, 8:R79 (11 May 2007) An annotation database (X:MAP) and BioConductor/R package (exonmap) have been developed to support fine-grained analysis of exon array data. |
|
Exogean: a framework for annotating protein-coding genes in eukaryotic genomic DNA Sarah Djebali, Franck Delaplace, Hugues Crollius Genome Biology 2006, 7(Suppl 1):S7 (7 August 2006) |