Table 1 |
|||||||||
|
Results for JIGSAW performance on the 31 ENCODE test regions when utilizing ab initio predictions and EST data |
|||||||||
|
Gene Sn |
Gene Sp |
Exon Sn |
Exon Sp |
Nuc Sn |
Nuc Sp |
Missed Genes |
Missed Exons |
Inserted Exons |
|
|
|
|||||||||
|
JIGSAW-GeneFinder4 |
22% |
24% |
59% |
77% |
77% |
87% |
15% |
9% |
9% |
|
JIGSAW-GeneFinder6 |
25% |
21% |
67% |
73% |
87% |
85% |
6% |
3% |
13% |
|
JIGSAW-non-Human-EST |
39% |
37% |
70% |
83% |
88% |
90% |
7% |
5% |
7% |
|
JIGSAW-non-Human-EST+ |
38% |
34% |
71% |
80% |
91% |
87% |
5% |
3% |
10% |
|
|
|||||||||
|
The percentage of test genes and exons that do not overlap a prediction are listed in the Missed Genes and Missed Exons columns, respectively. The rightmost column shows the percentage of predicted exons inserted into true introns. See text for details. Nuc, nucleotide; Sn, sensitivity; Sp, specificity. |
|||||||||
|
Allen et al. Genome Biology 2006 7(Suppl 1):S9 doi:10.1186/gb-2006-7-s1-s9 |
|||||||||
