Table 3 |
||||||
|
Performance of the CNVmix algorithm using validated (and wave corrected) data |
||||||
|
Calls |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Status |
Number of regions |
A |
B |
C |
D |
E |
|
|
||||||
|
Unvalidated |
25 |
5 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
5 |
|
Validated |
112 |
80 |
82 |
83 |
71 |
68 |
|
Total |
137 |
85 |
87 |
89 |
77 |
73 |
|
False discovery rate |
6 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
|
|
Sensitivity (confidence interval) |
71 (61, 79) |
73 (64, 81) |
74 (65, 82) |
63 (54, 72) |
61 (51, 70) |
|
|
Specificity (confidence interval) |
80 (61, 92) |
80 (61, 92) |
76 (57, 90) |
76 (57, 90) |
80 (61, 92) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
The number of regions called in five replicate experiments (A to E, ranked by standard deviation) using CNVmix with the thresholds described in the Materials and methods. The false discovery rate, sensitivity and specificity are quoted as percentages and the confidence intervals quoted are the 95% intervals. |
||||||
|
Marioni et al. Genome Biology 2007 8:R228 doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r228 |
||||||