Genome Biology Volume 8 Issue 10 |
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 ResearchPhenotypic and transcriptional response to selection for alcohol sensitivity in Drosophila melanogasterTatiana V Morozova1,2,3 , Robert RH Anholt1,2,4 and Trudy FC Mackay2,4  1Department of Zoology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 2WM Keck Center for Behavioral Biology, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 3Institute of Molecular Genetics RAS, Kurchatov Square, Moscow 123182, Russia 4Department of Genetics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA author email corresponding author email
Genome Biology 2007,
8:R231doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-10-r231
|
|
| Published: |
31 October 2007 |
Subject areas: Genetics, Physiology, Model organisms Abstract
Background
Alcoholism is a complex disorder determined by interactions between genetic and environmental risk factors. Drosophila represents a powerful model system to dissect the genetic architecture of alcohol sensitivity, as large numbers of flies can readily be reared in defined genetic backgrounds and under controlled environmental conditions. Furthermore, flies exposed to ethanol undergo physiological and behavioral changes that resemble human alcohol intoxication, including loss of postural control, sedation, and development of tolerance.
Results
We performed artificial selection for alcohol sensitivity for 35 generations and created duplicate selection lines that are either highly sensitive or resistant to ethanol exposure along with unselected control lines. We used whole genome expression analysis to identify 1,678 probe sets with different expression levels between the divergent lines, pooled across replicates, at a false discovery rate of q < 0.001. We assessed to what extent genes with altered transcriptional regulation might be causally associated with ethanol sensitivity by measuring alcohol sensitivity of 37 co-isogenic P-element insertional mutations in 35 candidate genes, and found that 32 of these mutants differed in sensitivity to ethanol exposure from their co-isogenic controls. Furthermore, 23 of these novel genes have human orthologues.
Conclusion
Combining whole genome expression profiling with selection for genetically divergent lines is an effective approach for identifying candidate genes that affect complex traits, such as alcohol sensitivity. Because of evolutionary conservation of function, it is likely that human orthologues of genes affecting alcohol sensitivity in Drosophila may contribute to alcohol-associated phenotypes in humans. |