Table 5 |
||
|
Comparison of function conservation approach with EEL algorithm |
||
|
Function conservation |
EEL algorithm |
|
|
|
||
|
TFBS detection |
Finding all potential TFBSs |
Finding all potential TFBSs |
|
Distance constraint used |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Alignment technique used |
None |
Non-direct DNA sequence alignment |
|
Distance between TFBSs |
Any |
Relatively close |
|
Number of genes compared |
Identification of conserved TFBSs at multiple gene level |
Identification of conserved TFBSs at single gene level |
|
Parameters used for predicting interacting TFs |
Conserved TFBS with function conservation of TFs at multiple gene (genome scale) level |
Conserved TFBS with TF binding affinity at single gene level |
|
Sensitivity* |
Higher |
Lower |
|
Specificity* |
Higher |
Lower |
|
|
||
|
*Relative comparison results between the function conservation approach and EEL algorithm from this study. |
||
|
Hu et al. Genome Biology 2007 8:R257 doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-12-r257 |
||