Table 2 |
|||||
|
Sensitivity and false discovery rate based on analysis of log2 intensities |
|||||
| MG1655 |
EDL933 |
||||
|
|
|
||||
| Chip ID |
Sensitivity |
FDR |
Chip ID |
Sensitivity |
FDR |
|
|
|||||
| 108276 |
0.988 |
0.021 |
1004602 |
0.994 |
0.13 |
| 108667 |
0.964 |
0.024 |
113504 |
0.988 |
0.12 |
| 113756 |
0.997 |
0.021 |
113509 |
0.980 |
0.12 |
| 114782 |
0.999 |
0.017 |
113757 |
0.989 |
0.13 |
| 1509502 |
0.999 |
0.043 |
1509502 |
0.970 |
0.11 |
| 1510802 |
0.999 |
0.015 |
1510802 |
0.994 |
0.11 |
| Average |
0.989 |
0.024 |
Average |
0.986 |
0.12 |
|
|
|||||
|
Analysis of the hybridization data obtained with MG1655 and EDL933 DNA in six replicates, with data analyzed based on log2 intensities. The sensitivity and false discovery rate (FDR) are given for the prediction of gene presence in MG1655 or EDL933 in the corresponding samples. |
|||||
|
Willenbrock et al. Genome Biology 2007 8:R267 doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-12-r267 |
|||||
