|
Cross-validation by qRT-PCR and CAGE in mouse liver versus E17.5 |
||||
| Target gene |
CAGE-TSSchip |
qRT-PCR |
CAGE |
|
| Probe ID |
Ratioa |
Ratioa |
Ratioa |
|
|
|
||||
| Scp2 |
pT04R06588376_1_55 |
1.54 |
2.22 |
2.25 |
| Phyh |
pT02F004A4350_1_56 |
1.47 |
1.48 |
2.09 |
| H2-Q7 |
pT17F02067AF1_1_1 |
1.33 |
1.44 |
2.52 |
| Gcgr |
pT11F072A22AF_1_56 |
1.10 |
1.32 |
1.58 |
| 1500017E21Rik |
pT19R022303AA_2_11 |
1.08 |
1.09 |
0.39b |
| H2-K1 |
pT17R01EFDD1A_2_55 |
1.08 |
1.36 |
3.04 |
| Ttr |
pT18F01417BA8_1_61 |
1.03 |
1.27 |
0.47b |
| Creb3l3 |
pT10R04D401D2_1_59 |
0.99 |
1.18 |
1.76 |
| Aldh7a1 |
pT18R0366ABBD_1_60 |
0.95 |
0.39b |
2.17 |
| Apoa1 |
A_65_P16973as |
0.93 |
1.14 |
0.76 |
| Ttr |
pT18F014197F5_1_51 |
0.93 |
1.14 |
0.56 |
| Ppara |
pT15F0521ABCF_1_61 |
0.92 |
0.92 |
1.77 |
| Bdh |
pT16F01DD69D0_1_61 |
0.83 |
0.91 |
0.93 |
| Hhex |
pT19F022F5EF6_1_61 |
0.75 |
0.88 |
1.63 |
| H2-K1 |
pT17R01EF8909_1_61 |
0.67 |
-0.35b,c |
2.89 |
| Trf |
A_65_P04625as |
0.65 |
0.59 |
0.94 |
| Mdh1 |
A_51_P218179as |
0.57 |
0.19b |
0.03b |
| Mcm7 |
pT05R08145E66_1_60 |
-0.52 |
-0.87 |
-0.33b |
| Nisch |
pT14R019FAD28_1_56 |
-0.54 |
-0.27b |
0.67c |
| D0H4S114 |
pT18R02055333_1_60 |
-0.67 |
-1.04 |
-0.95 |
|
Primer sequences are available in Additional data file 9. We assume that the absolute calue of the log ratio >0.5 is significantly different expression between liver and E17.5. aRatio = log10(liver/E17.5). bNon-significance. cTendency for the sample to be highly different from the CAGE-TSSchip result. CAGE, cap analysis gene expression; qRT-PCR, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. | ||||
Katayama et al. Genome Biology 2007 8:R42 doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-3-r42 |
||||