Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
.refereed research
 |  |  |  |  | 


Open AccessResearch

LongSAGE analysis of skeletal muscle at three prenatal stages in Tongcheng and Landrace pigs

Zhonglin Tang1,2* email, Yong Li1,2* email, Ping Wan3,4* email, Xiaoping Li2 email, Shuhong Zhao2 email, Bang Liu2 email, Bin Fan2 email, Mengjin Zhu2 email, Mei Yu2 email and Kui Li1,2 email

Department of Gene and Cell Engineering, State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100094, PR China

Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics, Breeding and Reproduction of Ministry of Education of China, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, PR China

Shanghai Huaguan Biochip Co. Ltd, Shanghai, 201203, PR China

Life and Environment Science College, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, 200234, PR China

author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally

Genome Biology 2007, 8:R115doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-6-r115

Published: 16 June 2007

Subject areas: Genome studies, Physiology

Abstract

Background

Obese and lean pig breeds show obvious differences in muscle growth; however, the molecular mechanism underlying phenotype variation remains unknown. Prenatal muscle development programs postnatal performance. Here, we describe a genome-wide analysis of differences in prenatal skeletal muscle between Tongcheng (a typical indigenous Chinese breed) and Landrace (a leaner Western breed) pigs.

Results

We generated transcriptome profiles of skeletal muscle from Tongcheng and Landrace pigs at 33, 65 and 90 days post coitus (dpc), using long serial analysis of gene expression (LongSAGE). We sequenced 317,115 LongSAGE tags and identified 1,400 and 1,201 differentially expressed transcripts during myogenesis in Tongcheng and Landrace pigs, respectively. From these, the Gene Ontology processes and expression patterns of these differentially expressed genes were constructed. Most of the genes showed different expression patterns in the two breeds. We also identified 532, 653 and 459 transcripts at 33, 65 and 90 dpc, respectively, that were differentially expressed between the two breeds. Growth factors, anti-apoptotic factors and genes involved in the regulation of protein synthesis were up-regulated in Landrace pigs. Finally, 12 differentially expressed genes were validated by quantitative PCR.

Conclusion

Our data show that gene expression phenotypes differ significantly between the two breeds. In particular, a slower muscle growth rate and more complicated molecular changes were found in Tongcheng pigs, while genes responsible for increased cellular growth and myoblast survival were up-regulated in Landrace pigs. Our analyses will assist in the identification of candidate genes for meat production traits and elucidation of the development of prenatal skeletal muscle in mammals.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.