Table 1 |
|||
|
Logistic regression coefficients with metabolic and physical interactions |
|||
|
Input |
Intercepts |
Coefficients |
R2 value |
|
|
|||
|
CoExp |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-5.01* |
2.44* |
0.00766 |
|
Physical |
-8.82* |
7.25* |
0.0588 |
|
ChIP-chip |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-3.37* |
0.568† |
0.000603 |
|
Physical |
-4.95* |
2.11* |
0.00666 |
|
ChIP-chip*CoExp |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-4.32* |
5.02* |
0.0246 |
|
Physical |
-6.39* |
9.17* |
0.0745 |
|
CoExp4Sp |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-2.32* |
2.36† |
0.00706 |
|
Physical |
-2.97* |
6.33* |
0.0546 |
|
CoExp2Sp |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-4.02* |
2.55* |
0.00594 |
|
Physical |
-8.16* |
10.5* |
0.103 |
|
CoExpPar |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-2.62* |
-2.07* |
0.00484 |
|
Physical |
-7.48* |
6.17* |
0.0373 |
|
GenNeigh |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-2.69* |
2.96* |
0.0280 |
|
Physical |
-5.65* |
6.20* |
0.219 |
|
CoOcc |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-1.71* |
1.49* |
0.0223 |
|
Physical |
-3.69* |
3.27* |
0.120 |
|
GenInt |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-4.18* |
4.06* |
0.0120 |
|
Physical |
-3.16* |
11.3* |
0.113 |
|
Y2H |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-3.35* |
-3.89* |
0.106 |
|
Physical |
-2.30* |
4.29* |
0.119 |
|
TAP-tag Gavin |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-3.85* |
-0.153 |
1.87e-06 |
|
Physical |
-10.3* |
24.5* |
0.298 |
|
TAP-tag Krogan |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-3.68* |
0.0350 |
9.19e-08 |
|
Physical |
-8.99* |
18.37* |
0.146 |
|
TAP-tag (G+K) |
|||
|
Metabolic |
-3.78* |
-0.54 |
1.77e-05 |
|
Physical |
-12.3* |
32.7* |
0.322 |
|
|
|||
|
The scores of the 'omics' datasets were in turn considered as the continuous independent variable to fit a logit function to the presence/absence of interactions. *P < 2e-16; †P < 0.0001. CoExp, correlated mRNA expression; ChIP-chip, shared binding of transcription factors; ChIP-chip*CoExp, co-regulation; CoExp4Sp, conserved co-expression between four species; CoExp2Sp, conserved co-expression between two species; CoExpPar, paralogous conserved co-expression; GenNeigh, CoOcc, correlated phylogenetic profiles; GenInt, shared genetic interactions; Y2H, yeast-two-hybrid; TAP-tag Gavin, TAP-tag purifications (Gavin et al. [3]); TAP-tag Krogan, TAP-tag purifications (Krogan et al. [4]); TAP-tag (G+K), the sum of SA scores derived from the two TAP-tag purification data sets. |
|||
|
van Noort et al. Genome Biology 2007 8:R197 doi:10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r197 |
|||