Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
.refereed research
 |  |  |  |  | 


Open AccessResearch

A genome-wide screen for modifiers of transgene variegation identifies genes with critical roles in development

Alyson Ashe1 email, Daniel K Morgan1,2 email, Nadia C Whitelaw1,2 email, Timothy J Bruxner1 email, Nicola K Vickaryous1 email, Liza L Cox3 email, Natalie C Butterfield4 email, Carol Wicking4 email, Marnie E Blewitt5 email, Sarah J Wilkins6 email, Gregory J Anderson6 email, Timothy C Cox3 email and Emma Whitelaw1 email

Epigenetics Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia

School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, 4001, Australia

Division of Craniofacial Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle 98195, WA, USA

Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, St Lucia, Queensland 4072, Australia

Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria 3050, Australia

Iron Metabolism Laboratory, Queensland Institute of Medical Research, 300 Herston Road, Herston, Queensland 4006, Australia

author email corresponding author email

Genome Biology 2008, 9:R182doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-12-r182

Published: 19 December 2008

Subject areas: Development, Genetics

Abstract

Background

Some years ago we established an N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea screen for modifiers of transgene variegation in the mouse and a preliminary description of the first six mutant lines, named MommeD1-D6, has been published. We have reported the underlying genes in three cases: MommeD1 is a mutation in SMC hinge domain containing 1 (Smchd1), a novel modifier of epigenetic gene silencing; MommeD2 is a mutation in DNA methyltransferase 1 (Dnmt1); and MommeD4 is a mutation in Smarca 5 (Snf2h), a known chromatin remodeler. The identification of Dnmt1 and Smarca5 attest to the effectiveness of the screen design.

Results

We have now extended the screen and have identified four new modifiers, MommeD7-D10. Here we show that all ten MommeDs link to unique sites in the genome, that homozygosity for the mutations is associated with severe developmental abnormalities and that heterozygosity results in phenotypic abnormalities and reduced reproductive fitness in some cases. In addition, we have now identified the underlying genes for MommeD5 and MommeD10. MommeD5 is a mutation in Hdac1, which encodes histone deacetylase 1, and MommeD10 is a mutation in Baz1b (also known as Williams syndrome transcription factor), which encodes a transcription factor containing a PHD-type zinc finger and a bromodomain. We show that reduction in the level of Baz1b in the mouse results in craniofacial features reminiscent of Williams syndrome.

Conclusions

These results demonstrate the importance of dosage-dependent epigenetic reprogramming in the development of the embryo and the power of the screen to provide mouse models to study this process.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.