Table 1 |
||||||||
|
Experimental differences in original circadian microarray analyses |
||||||||
| Publication |
% Circadian |
Number of time points |
Light intensity (μmol/m2 per second) |
Microarray platform |
Technical replicates |
Low-level analysis |
Circadian detection algorithm |
Presence cut-off |
|
|
||||||||
| Harmer and coworkers [4] |
5.5 |
12 |
60 |
Affymetrix Arabidopsis Genome |
2 |
Affymetrix MAS 4.0 |
CORRCOS |
None |
| Edwards and coworkers [6] |
15.4 |
13 |
60 to 65 |
Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 |
N/A |
GC-RMA |
COSOPT (less stringent) |
None |
| Covington and Harmer [7] |
10.4 |
12 |
120 |
Affymetrix Arabidopsis ATH1 |
N/A |
dChip |
COSOPT (more stringent) |
Genes present in ≥ 4 of 12 samples |
|
|
||||||||
|
Covington et al. Genome Biology 2008 9:R130 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-8-r130 |
||||||||
