|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 3.
Comparison of FoxA1 ChIP-Seq and ChIP-chip. (a) Overlap between the FoxA1 binding sites detected by ChIP-chip (MAT; FDR <1% and fold-enrichment
>2) and ChIP-Seq (MACS; FDR <1%). Shown are the numbers of regions detected by both
platforms (that is, having at least 1 bp in common) or unique to each platform. (b) The distributions of ChIP-Seq tag number and ChIP-chip MATscore [13] for FoxA1 binding sites identified by both platforms. (c) MATscore distributions of FoxA1 ChIP-chip at ChIP-Seq/chip overlapping peaks, ChIP-Seq
unique peaks, and genome background. For each peak, the mean MATscore for all probes
within the 300 bp region centered at the ChIP-Seq peak summit is used. Genome background is based on MATscores of all array probes in the FoxA1
ChIP-chip data. (d) Width distributions of FoxA1 ChIP-Seq/chip overlapping peaks and ChIP-Seq unique peaks
at different fold-enrichments (less than 25, 25 to 50, and larger than 50). (e) Spatial resolution for FoxA1 ChIP-chip and ChIP-Seq peaks. The Wilcoxon test was used
to calculate the p-values for (d) and (e). (f) Motif occurrence within the central 200 bp regions for FoxA1 ChIP-Seq/chip overlapping
peaks and platform unique peaks. Error bars showing standard deviation were calculated
from random sampling of 500 peaks ten times for each category. Background motif occurrences
are based on 100,000 randomly selected 200 bp regions in the human genome, excluding
regions in genome assembly gaps (containing 'N').
Zhang et al. Genome Biology 2008 9:R137 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r137 |