Table 1 |
||||||
|
Feature comparisons |
||||||
|
Feature |
PathBLAST [37] |
Fanmod [41] |
Narada [45] |
SAGA [27] |
NetMatch [26] |
NetGrep |
|
|
||||||
|
Non-linear queries |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Allows arbitrary protein annotations |
1 per node |
Unlimited |
Unlimited |
|||
|
Boolean combination of annotations |
X |
X |
||||
|
Inexact matches |
X |
X |
X |
|||
|
Multiple edge types in a network |
X |
X |
X |
|||
|
Boolean combination of edge types |
X |
|||||
|
UI for searching/choosing annotations |
X |
X |
||||
|
Can be used with Cytoscape |
X |
X |
||||
|
Can be used as a standalone |
X |
X |
X |
X |
X |
|
|
Custom data sets provided |
X |
X |
X |
|||
|
|
||||||
|
A comparison of built-in features available in systems that can, in principle, be used for querying interactomes using network schemas. A network alignment tool, PathBLAST, and a network motif finder, Fanmod, are shown for comparison. All other systems are explicitly designed for querying interactomes utilizing labeled subgraphs. |
||||||
|
Banks et al. Genome Biology 2008 9:R138 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-9-r138 |
||||||