Table 2 |
||||||
|
Performance for gene mention normalization for mouse, yeast, and fruit fly datasets |
||||||
|
Short description of the submitted run |
Precision |
Recall |
F measure (%) |
True positives (n) |
False positives (n) |
False negatives (n) |
|
|
||||||
|
Mouse, training set |
86.6 |
69.2 |
77.0 |
322 |
50 |
143 |
|
Yeast, training set |
89.0 |
84.0 |
86.4 |
219 |
27 |
42 |
|
Fly, training set |
87.9 |
55.6 |
68.1 |
124 |
17 |
99 |
|
Mouse, test set |
91.6 |
72.6 |
81.0 |
355 |
36 |
149 |
|
Yeast, test set |
94.9 |
84.8 |
89.6 |
520 |
28 |
93 |
|
Fly, test set |
82.1 |
69.5 |
75.3 |
298 |
65 |
131 |
|
|
||||||
|
Current performance of the gene mention normalization component on the BioCreative I gene normalization sets. Each run includes an extended gene name lexicon (based on BioCreative I data and with additional synonyms from EntrezGene), all false positive filters, and the disambiguation. |
||||||
|
Hakenberg et al. Genome Biology 2008 9(Suppl 2):S14 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s14 |
||||||
