Table 1

Performance measures

Rank

P

r

F

signif

% alt


1

0.8848

0.8597

0.8721

4-19

32.48

2

0.8930

0.8449

0.8683

6-19

14.02

3

0.8493

0.8828

0.8657

6-19

14.08

4

0.8727

0.8541

0.8633

7-19

31.77

5

0.8577

0.8680

0.8628

7-19

16.67

6

0.8271

0.8932

0.8589

7-19

16.02

7

0.8697

0.8255

0.8470

8-19

14.83

8

0.8435

0.8139

0.8285

10-19

14.57

9

0.8628

0.7966

0.8284

10-19

14.55

10

0.8554

0.7683

0.8095

11-19

19.76

11

0.7295

0.8849

0.7997

13-19

16.82

12

0.9267

0.6891

0.7905

14-19

19.73

13

0.8883

0.6970

0.7811

15-19

37.05

14

0.8046

0.7361

0.7688

16-19

20.43

15

0.8228

0.7108

0.7627

17-19

16.80

16

0.8432

0.6857

0.7563

17-19

34.02

17

0.7168

0.6233

0.6668

18-19

28.23

18

0.6056

0.6411

0.6229

19

31.71

19

0.5009

0.4612

0.4802

-

28.46


The precision, recall, and F score for the best submitted run from each of 19 workshop participants, sorted by F score. Each team has an F score that has a statistically significant comparison (P < 0.05) with the teams indicated in the signif column. The column labeled % alt is the percentage of true positives in the submission that matched an ALTGENE annotation.

Smith et al. Genome Biology 2008 9(Suppl 2):S2   doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s2

Open Data