Table 1 |
||||||
|
GM results: performances of systems and individual components on the test and training data. |
||||||
|
Test Data |
Training Data |
|||||
|
|
||||||
|
Tagger |
Precision |
Recall |
F-measure |
Precision |
Recall |
F-measure |
|
|
||||||
|
CCP |
77.30 |
77.74 |
77.52 |
83.68 |
83.48 |
83.58 |
|
ABNER |
80.38 |
73.26 |
76.65 |
83.85 |
80.86 |
82.33 |
|
LingPipe |
72.53 |
80.00 |
76.09 |
88.47 |
92.77 |
90.57 |
|
2/3 Majority |
85.54 (2) |
76.83 (3) |
80.95 (3) |
91.15 |
86.33 |
88.68 |
|
Unanimous |
92.78 (1) |
49.12 (4) |
64.24 (4) |
94.56 |
61.41 |
74.46 |
|
Overlap |
66.22 (4) |
83.72 (2) |
73.94 (4) |
79.27 |
91.17 |
84.80 |
|
Median |
85.08 |
79.05 |
81.32 |
|||
|
|
||||||
|
Presented are median scores, as supplied by organizers. Quartiles for our runs are shown in parentheses. GM, gene mention. |
||||||
|
Baumgartner et al. Genome Biology 2008 9(Suppl 2):S9 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s9 |
||||||
