|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 3.
Relative performance of the network and the classifier methods by APR. Each filled
circle represents a specific Gene Ontology (GO) annotation term in the biological
process (BP), cellular component (CC), or molecular function (MF) class, plotting
average precision (APR) for the slim network on the x-axis and for the classifier
on the y-axis. The APR of the network and the classifier show a similar trend to the
AUC in Figure 2. The APRs tends to be higher in the networkslim than in the classifier for less frequent categories ('3 to 10', '11 to 30') with most
points falling under the diagonal, but are similar for more frequent terms ('31 to
100', '101 to 300'), with most points near the diagonal.
Kim et al. Genome Biology 2008 9(Suppl 1):S5 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-s1-s5 |