Table 1

Performance measures

Rank
P
r
F
signif
% alt

1
0.8848
0.8597
0.8721
4-19
32.48
2
0.8930
0.8449
0.8683
6-19
14.02
3
0.8493
0.8828
0.8657
6-19
14.08
4
0.8727
0.8541
0.8633
7-19
31.77
5
0.8577
0.8680
0.8628
7-19
16.67
6
0.8271
0.8932
0.8589
7-19
16.02
7
0.8697
0.8255
0.8470
8-19
14.83
8
0.8435
0.8139
0.8285
10-19
14.57
9
0.8628
0.7966
0.8284
10-19
14.55
10
0.8554
0.7683
0.8095
11-19
19.76
11
0.7295
0.8849
0.7997
13-19
16.82
12
0.9267
0.6891
0.7905
14-19
19.73
13
0.8883
0.6970
0.7811
15-19
37.05
14
0.8046
0.7361
0.7688
16-19
20.43
15
0.8228
0.7108
0.7627
17-19
16.80
16
0.8432
0.6857
0.7563
17-19
34.02
17
0.7168
0.6233
0.6668
18-19
28.23
18
0.6056
0.6411
0.6229
19
31.71
19
0.5009
0.4612
0.4802
-
28.46

The precision, recall, and F score for the best submitted run from each of 19 workshop participants, sorted by F score. Each team has an F score that has a statistically significant comparison (P < 0.05) with the teams indicated in the signif column. The column labeled % alt is the percentage of true positives in the submission that matched an ALTGENE annotation.

Smith et al. Genome Biology 2008 9(Suppl 2):S2   doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s2