|
Recall, precision, F-measure and rank for best gene normalization run per team |
|||||||
| Team/run |
Recall |
Precision |
F-measure micro-average |
Rank micro |
F-measure macro-average |
Rank macro |
Significance range |
|
|
|||||||
| T042_1 |
0.833 |
0.789 |
0.810 |
1 |
0.811 |
1 |
3-20 |
| T034_1 |
0.815 |
0.792 |
0.804 |
2 |
0.782 |
2 |
8-20 |
| T013_1 |
0.768 |
0.833 |
0.799 |
3 |
0.779 |
3 |
8-20 |
| T004_1 |
0.734 |
0.841 |
0.784 |
4 |
‡0.777 |
4 |
8-20 |
| T109_1 |
0.824 |
0.743 |
0.781 |
5 |
0.775 |
5 |
8-20 |
| T104_1 |
0.743 |
0.807 |
0.774 |
6 |
0.773 |
6 |
9-20 |
| T101_2 |
0.743 |
0.801 |
0.771 |
7 |
0.755 |
7 |
10-20 |
| T107_1 |
0.740 |
0.784 |
0.761 |
8 |
0.739 |
*9 |
12-20 |
| T113_2 |
0.761 |
0.752 |
0.756 |
9 |
0.745 |
*8 |
11-20 |
| T108_3 |
0.749 |
0.726 |
0.737 |
10 |
0.724 |
10 |
13-20 |
| T007_2 |
0.703 |
0.746 |
0.724 |
11 |
0.694 |
*12 |
16-20 |
| T017_1 |
0.708 |
0.720 |
0.714 |
12 |
‡0.710 |
*11 |
15-20 |
| T110_1 |
0.629 |
0.783 |
0.698 |
13 |
0.685 |
*14 |
16-20 |
| T111_3 |
0.664 |
0.717 |
0.689 |
14 |
0.664 |
*15 |
17-20 |
| T030_1 |
0.661 |
0.716 |
0.687 |
15 |
0.649 |
*16 |
17-20 |
| T006_2 |
0.606 |
0.767 |
0.677 |
16 |
‡0.686 |
*13 |
19-20 |
| T036_1 |
0.713 |
0.520 |
0.602 |
17 |
0.595 |
17 |
19-20 |
| T014_1 |
0.485 |
0.762 |
0.593 |
18 |
0.584 |
18 |
20 |
| T102_3 |
0.790 |
0.425 |
0.552 |
19 |
0.559 |
19 |
20 |
| T058_2 |
0.415 |
0.375 |
0.394 |
20 |
0.398 |
20 |
|
|
Columns include recall, precision, F-measure and rank for micro-averaged scores, F-measure and rank for macro-averaged scores, and significance based on macro-averaged score distributions. Bold * indicates that rank for micro-average and macro-average are different; ‡ indicates that a different run was used as the high-scoring run in macro-averaged versus micro-averaged results. | |||||||
Morgan et al. Genome Biology 2008 9(Suppl 2):S3 doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-s2-s3 |
|||||||