Research
Characterization and comparative profiling of the small RNA transcriptomes in two phases of locust
-
* Corresponding author: Le Kang lkang@ioz.ac.cn
State Key Laboratory of Integrated Management of Pest Insects and Rodents, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Datun Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100101, PR China
Genome Biology 2009, 10:R6 doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-1-r6
Published: 16 January 2009Additional files
Additional data file 3:
Figure S1 shows alignment of miR-79 and miR-10 of different species. Figure S2 shows expression patterns of locust miRNAs. Figure S3 shows transposon types from which small RNAs are derived in the locust. Figure S4 shows lengths and initial nucleotide distributions of the unannotated small RNA sequences. Table S1 lists the sequences of conserved miRNAs and miRNA*s in the locust. Table S2 lists precursor sequences of the seven conserved miRNAs that have a conserved star sequence. Table S3 lists sequences of predicted locust-specific miRNAs. Table S4 lists the ten most abundant miRNA-like 5'-end small RNAs in the remaining reads after annotation of miRNAs, siRNAs and piRNA-like small RNAs. Table S5 lists endo-siRNAs with different expression levels between the two phases. Table S6 lists piRNA-like small RNAs with different expression levels between the two phases. The Methods show the way to determine the best parameters of our miRNA prediction method and assess the reliability of our method using Drosophila miRNA data.
Format: PDF Size: 464KB Download file
This file can be viewed with: Adobe Acrobat Reader
