Log on / register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
.refereed research
 |  |  |  |  | 


Open AccessHighly AccessResearch

Divergence of exonic splicing elements after gene duplication and the impact on gene structures

Zhenguo Zhang1,2* email, Li Zhou1,2* email, Ping Wang1,2 email, Yang Liu1,2 email, Xianfeng Chen1,2 email, Landian Hu1,3 email and Xiangyin Kong1,3 email

The Key Laboratory of Stem Cell Biology, Institute of Health Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences (SIBS), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SJTUSM), 225 South Chong Qing Road, Shanghai 200025, PR China

Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, 19A Yuquan Road, Beijing 100049, PR China

State Key Laboratory of Medical Genomics, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University, 197 Rui Jin Road II, Shanghai 200025, PR China

author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally

Genome Biology 2009, 10:R120doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-11-r120

Published: 2 November 2009

Subject areas: Evolution, Genome studies

Abstract

Background

The origin of new genes and their contribution to functional novelty has been the subject of considerable interest. There has been much progress in understanding the mechanisms by which new genes originate. Here we examine a novel way that new gene structures could originate, namely through the evolution of new alternative splicing isoforms after gene duplication.

Results

We studied the divergence of exonic splicing enhancers and silencers after gene duplication and the contributions of such divergence to the generation of new splicing isoforms. We found that exonic splicing enhancers and exonic splicing silencers diverge especially fast shortly after gene duplication. About 10% and 5% of paralogous exons undergo significantly asymmetric evolution of exonic splicing enhancers and silencers, respectively. When compared to pre-duplication ancestors, we found that there is a significant overall loss of exonic splicing enhancers and the magnitude increases with duplication age. Detailed examination reveals net gains and losses of exonic splicing enhancers and silencers in different copies and paralog clusters after gene duplication. Furthermore, we found that exonic splicing enhancer and silencer changes are mainly caused by synonymous mutations, though nonsynonymous changes also contribute. Finally, we found that exonic splicing enhancer and silencer divergence results in exon splicing state transitions (from constitutive to alternative or vice versa), and that the proportion of paralogous exon pairs with different splicing states also increases over time, consistent with previous predictions.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that exonic splicing enhancer and silencer changes after gene duplication have important roles in alternative splicing divergence and that these changes contribute to the generation of new gene structures.


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.