Table 2 |
|||||||
|
Bowtie alignment performance versus Maq with filtered read set |
|||||||
|
Platform |
CPU time |
Wall clock time |
Reads mapped per hour (millions) |
Peak virtual memory footprint (megabytes) |
Bowtie speed up |
Reads aligned (%) |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Bowtie |
PC |
16 m 39 s |
17 m 47 s |
29.8 |
1,353 |
- |
74.9 |
|
Maq |
11 h 15 m 58 s |
11 h 22 m 2 s |
0.78 |
804 |
38.4× |
78.0 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Bowtie |
Server |
18 m 20 s |
18 m 46 s |
28.3 |
1,352 |
- |
74.9 |
|
Maq |
18 h 49 m 7 s |
18 h 50 m 16 s |
0.47 |
804 |
60.2× |
78.0 |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
Performance and sensitivity of Bowtie v0.9.6 and Maq v0.6.6 when the read set is filtered using Maq's 'catfilter' command to eliminate poly-A artifacts. The filter eliminates 438,145 out of 8,839,010 reads. Other experimental parameters are identical to those of the experiments in Table 1. CPU, central processing unit. |
|||||||
|
Langmead et al. Genome Biology 2009 10:R25 doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-3-r25 |
|||||||