Table 2 |
|||||
|
Comparison of microarray and RT-qPCR results for housekeeping or stable genes |
|||||
|
ID |
Genome ID |
Name |
Maximum change ARRAY |
Maximum change QPCR |
Function |
|
|
|||||
|
LQ0AAB30YA12FM1.SCF |
[Esi0298_0008] |
Dyn |
0.23 |
0.77 |
Dynein |
|
CL1914Contig1 |
[Esi0021_0024] |
ARP2.1 |
0.22 |
0.44 |
Actin related protein |
|
CL3Contig2 |
[Esi0387_0021] |
EF1A |
0.08 |
0.46 |
Elongation factor 1 alpha |
|
CL8Contig12 |
[Esi0053_0059] |
TUA |
0.57 |
0.91 |
Alpha tubulin |
|
CL1073Contig1 |
[Esi0054_0059] |
UBCE |
0.22 |
0.38 |
Ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme |
|
CL29Contig4 |
[Esi0302_0019] |
UBQ |
0.18 |
0.82 |
Ubiquitin |
|
CL461Contig1 |
[Esi0072_0068] |
R26S |
0.22 |
n/a |
Ribosomal protein S26 |
|
|
|||||
|
The table displays the maximum log2-ratio between any stress and the control condition for both the microarray and the RT-qPCR analysis. No RT-qPCR value is available for R26S, as this gene was used for normalization of the RT-qPCR samples. ID corresponds to the name of the sequence on the array. |
|||||
|
Dittami et al. Genome Biology 2009 10:R66 doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-6-r66 |
|||||