Table 1 |
|||
|
Comparison between initial, assisted, and theoretical 2× canine assemblies |
|||
|
Canis familiaris - 2× assembly |
|||
|
|
|||
|
Initial draft |
Assisted |
Theoretical |
|
|
|
|||
|
Bases assembled (%) |
81.0 |
86.5 |
94.1 |
|
Total contig length (Mb) |
1,697 |
1,823 |
1,969 |
|
N50 contig (kb) |
2.5 |
2.8 |
3.3 |
|
N50 scaffold gapped (kb) |
18.6 |
53.1 |
4,039.7 |
|
N50 scaffold ungapped (kb) |
10.3 |
36.8 |
3,519.1 |
|
|
|||
|
Gnerre et al. Genome Biology 2009 10:R88 doi:10.1186/gb-2009-10-8-r88 |
|||