|
Resolution: standard / high Figure 1.
Conservation of morphology and gene expression patterns in the developmental programs
of D. discoideum and D. purpureum. (a) An illustration of the developmental programs. Both species begin the developmental
program by aggregation of starving cells into centers that contain approximately 50,000
cells. The aggregates undergo morphological transformations from loose aggregates
to tight aggregates to tipped aggregates while the cells differentiate into prespore
and prestalk cells (not shown). Later in development, D. purpureum slugs (right) migrate while leaving a cellular stalk behind them whereas D. discoideum slugs do not. After culmination, the fruiting bodies are similar in size and shape
and both consist of a ball of spores (sorus) carried on top of a cellular stalk as
indicated. They differ in that D. purpureum fruiting bodies lack a basal disc at the bottom of the stalk and their sori are purple
rather than yellow. (b) Developmental morphologies. A top view with light microscopy of cells developing on
dark nitrocellulose filters is shown. Species names and developmental times are indicated.
Scale bar: 0.5 mm. (c) The heat maps represent the patterns of change in standardized mRNA abundance for
all the genes in the D. discoideum and the D. purpureum genomes. Each row represents an average of 85 genes and each column represents a developmental
time point (hours). The colors represent relative mRNA abundances (see scale). The
genes are ordered according to their regulation pattern in each species. The black
lines divide the transcripts, from top to bottom, into: down-regulated, intermediate
regulation and up-regulated. The dendrograms represent the differences between the
transcriptomes at each time point. (d) The maximal similarity between each D. purpureum developmental time point (x-axis) to each D. discoideum time point (y-axis) across the 7,560 orthologs. The dashed line represents a hypothetical
comparison between perfectly synchronous developmental programs.
Parikh et al. Genome Biology 2010 11:R35 doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r35 |